Sharpies volley
Player Valuation: £35m
What an absolute clown. Another one getting money off sky for being a yes man.
- Status
The Missing Lineker
Player Valuation: £1m
The charmless joyless spring onion
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £35m
Any link to what he said?
He basically said, the referee reckoned they were both pulling so VAR didn’t give it but if the referee did give it “I am one hundred percent confident that VAR would’ve cleared it” - direct quote from Sky Sports.
So he’s saying, it’s a penalty and VAR wouldn’t have stopped it being given as a penalty but because Michael Oliver decided he didn’t fancy giving it they didn’t overrule him ON WHAT WAS A PENALTY and left the red card to stand which ultimately lost us the game rather than gave us the chance to be 2-0 up.
W
T
A
F
So he’s saying, it’s a penalty and VAR wouldn’t have stopped it being given as a penalty but because Michael Oliver decided he didn’t fancy giving it they didn’t overrule him ON WHAT WAS A PENALTY and left the red card to stand which ultimately lost us the game rather than gave us the chance to be 2-0 up.
W
T
A
F
brieverton
Player Valuation: £50m
If I'm looking for a smoking gun here, it's the Pickford / van Dijk incident.
Our cards have been marked since then.
Our cards have been marked since then.
It was pointed out to him repeatedly by the presenter that Richarlison was not holding, but he just kept repeating that line
nevsonlymate
Player Valuation: £10m
And that’s why they will never improve as they get to police themselves and one of their old friends gets to defend them after the weekend, did we get the reason why the lad wasn’t sent off for the penalty ?
VAR can't look at bookings, other than where the ref books the wrong player
Sharpies volley
Player Valuation: £35m
Not sure I've got the technical ability to sort that mate, sorry. I found it by accident on YouTube.
Absolutely pointless. All he does is back the ref.
nevsonlymate
Player Valuation: £10m
Not thinking about VAR surly the defender stopped a goal scoring opportunity by giving the fowl away so surly a yellow but what was the difference with the braithwaite incident as he was sent off for preventing a goal scoring opportunity
The player who made the foul was already booked. VAR can only look at red card offences, so once they decided it wasn't a red, they couldn't go back and give him a second yellow. Crazy!!
luuk_deventer
Player Valuation: £8m
The on field referee has the final decision. So if the on field referee sees it and says no, there has to be a threshold reached where the VAR ref says you have missed something in order to send him to the touchline and review the video footage. If the VAR ref just disagrees with the on field referees decision, that does not automatically mean that the on field referee gets to review it again. Maybe it should be like that, but VAR is not used like that at the moment. This is why every time the on field referee goes to the touchline, he overturns the original decision.
Some penalties that have been given this season have been soft and, maybe with another look at VAR, the referee would change his mind but it is only there for the clear and obvious errors, not the ones where it could go either way.
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
