ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

[Dad watched Dixie]

Lest we forget that if the clown Davies had bothered to shoot., we would have beaten United so claims that the RS are the best team ever are somewhat exaggerated.

 

[Tin-Tin]

Salah banking them their next £150+ million splurge when he ends up at PSG next season.

And goes full on Hazard/Coutinho/Dembele when he does. Rather he stayed another year and left for free.

 

[ForeverBlue92]

And goes full on Hazard/Coutinho/Dembele when he does. Rather he stayed another year and left for free.

Nailed on!

 

[larbert toffee]

7-1 against Sunderland any use?

My youngest lad's first home game, made even better for the fact that Roy Keane was in charge of the macams.

 

[davek]

Two things to remember:

1/ their purple patch has got them to second place in the league to a Chelsea team that's sleepwalked through the season so far without breaking sweat, and one point ahead of a Man City team who can - as we all know - rattle off 12-15 wins on the bounce.

2/ they've won the title ONCE in the last 31 seasons....the truth is they aren't very good at it.

 

[BlueStevie35]

I know a goal is a goal and that but in that match, every netting is as scrappy as the come.

The Gravesen and Radzinski goals weren’t

 

[Lee Smith]

Salah: never produced in a big game.

Ronaldo: always produces in a big game.

3-1 for United.

The day the Liverpool title credentials get found out.

One title in 31 years.

There's a reason for that...the Establishment's club are never as good as they like to claim they are....despite all the "world class" players they say they have.

 

[blue to the bone]

Two things to remember:

1/ their purple patch has got them to second place in the league to a Chelsea team that's sleepwalked through the season so far without breaking sweat, and one point ahead of a Man City team who can - as we all know - rattle off 12-15 wins on the bounce.

2/ they've won the title ONCE in the last 31 seasons....the truth is they aren't very good at it.

What happened 10 or 15 years ago is totally irrelevant now . It's the manager and players they have now that matters. Not history

 

[NathDogg]

Two things to remember:

1/ their purple patch has got them to second place in the league to a Chelsea team that's sleepwalked through the season so far without breaking sweat, and one point ahead of a Man City team who can - as we all know - rattle off 12-15 wins on the bounce.

2/ they've won the title ONCE in the last 31 seasons....the truth is they aren't very good at it.

Please fella, just stop it now, it's not ending well for you.

You're like a gambler chasing a bet and doubling down on the madness.

They can never be ruled out of any title or trophy that they are in, ever, due to their inherent fluekeyness or a shocking ref or opposition's players doing the maddest things against them and notching oggies or the hit the Peds and start blowing teams away.

Never rule them out mate.

 

[hallamblue]

Please fella, just stop it now, it's not ending well for you.

You're like a gambler chasing a bet and doubling down on the madness.

They can never be ruled out of any title or trophy that they are in, ever, due to their inherent fluekeyness or a shocking ref or opposition's players doing the maddest things against them and notching oggies or the hit the Peds and start blowing teams away.

Never rule them out mate.

It doesn't work that way in the league, hence the fact they've only won it once in 30 years. They look close to their best, although the defence isn't as solid as it was. If Salah and Mane go to the African Cup of Nations they will need to cope without them. I can see a close race between the rs, City and Chelsea. Currently they are the best first 11, but their squad depth is not as good as Chelsea and City's, and it's a long season.

 

[davek]

What happened 10 or 15 years ago is totally irrelevant now . It's the manager and players they have now that matters. Not history

No, not 10 or 15 years...31 years.

Liverpool dont get better than this and they have a limited squad. They're still sandwiched between two teams better equipped to win the title.

5-0 against a ropey United tam managed by an utter spanner gets you 3 points. That's it.

Nine games into a long long season.

 

[boris]

It doesn't work that way in the league, hence the fact they've only won it once in 30 years. They look close to their best, although the defence isn't as solid as it was. If Salah and Mane go to the African Cup of Nations they will need to cope without them. I can see a close race between the rs, City and Chelsea. Currently they are the best first 11, but their squad depth is not as good as Chelsea and City's, and it's a long season.

Being honest HB, they certainly haven’t looked to have the best first 11 in the 2 games we’ve seen against Chelsea and City at Anfield this year.

The officials may have seen to it that they scraped out of both home games with relatively respectable draws but the reality of what we seen was that the other 2 looked way ahead of them.

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Haha @gwladysnight liking this the little rascal

 

[blue to the bone]

No, not 10 or 15 years...31 years.

Liverpool dont get better than this and they have a limited squad. They're still sandwiched between two teams better equipped to win the title.

5-0 against a ropey United tam managed by an utter spanner gets you 3 points. That's it.

Nine games into a long long season.

They won a champions league 3 years ago and the league 2. They are one of the best teams in Europe. To not admit that is you doing what you do best . Chatting absolute wham to try and act like you know it All

 

[Saint Domingo]

Lest we forget that if the clown Davies had bothered to shoot., we would have beaten United so claims that the RS are the best team ever are somewhat exaggerated.

I’d literally forgotten Davies cocked that up. He truly is an absolute joke of a footballer.