Usmanov

Status
Not open for further replies.

What has all that stuff got to do with possible interest from Usmanov?

Basically Gwladysnight think Usmanov cant be involved and we are imploding because we have a 7% loan.

I've pointed out that may not be the case, and given examples of different businesses owned by wealthy people who borrow/access capital at 7%+ rates.

He has then had a prolonged tantrum. Thats basically the synopsis of this debate
 
Well done on pointing out Amazon have a WACC of 8%. I pointed this out to you about 5 pages back.

It's funny how I supposedly dont know what WACC is, but currently told you what Amazons was isnt it?
You knew what Amazon's WACC was because you looked it up. The problem was you thought it was the same as the interest rate they were paying on debt.

You told us Bezos was happy to borrow at 8% because Amazon's WACC was 8%. It is probably one of the funniest but most ill-informed posts I have ever seen and that truly is saying something.
 
You knew what Amazon's WACC was because you looked it up. The problem was you thought it was the same as the interest rate they were paying on debt.

You told us Bezos was happy to borrow at 8% because Amazon's WACC was 8%. It is probably one of the funniest but most ill-informed posts I have ever seen and that truly is saying something.
I know right! Side splittingly hilarious HAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Basically Gwladysnight think Usmanov cant be involved and we are imploding because we have a 7% loan.

I've pointed out that may not be the case, and given examples of different businesses owned by wealthy people who borrow/access capital at 7%+ rates.

He has then had a prolonged tantrum. Thats basically the synopsis of this debate
You thought Amazon were borrowing at 8% because that is their WACC. Just accept you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

Despite me showing you what rate Amazon are actually borrowing at on multiple occasions you still post absolute nonsense.

It is a publicly listed company. All you have to do is look up how much debt they have and how much that debt costs them and divide the two. Yet you bring WACC into it.
 

They're not pumping their own money in all the time, he'd be skint. Most clubs have loans no matter how rich an owner. I'm no financial EXPERT, i HAVE £1.58 IN THE BANK SO i'M PROBABLY NOT THE BEST PERSON TO CHIP IN ON THIS DEBATE BUT THERE YOU GO LOL, AH FFS CAPS CAME ON
 
What the hell has happened to this thread?! Came in to see if we're getting pumped with dirty cash and ended up having to take a degree in corporate finance to understand what's being said.
Actually, I think the issue is neither @gwladysnight nor @tjf have one between them. So it's full of illegible nonsense.

Pair of balls from the same nut sack.
 
They're not pumping their own money in all the time, he'd be skint. Most clubs have loans no matter how rich an owner. I'm no financial EXPERT, i HAVE £1.58 IN THE BANK SO i'M PROBABLY NOT THE BEST PERSON TO CHIP IN ON THIS DEBATE BUT THERE YOU GO LOL, AH FFS CAPS CAME ON
I read the 8 as a B and now you are the richest person i know and I wonder why you didn't buy the club from Kenwright years ago.
 

You knew what Amazon's WACC was because you looked it up. The problem was you thought it was the same as the interest rate they were paying on debt.

You told us Bezos was happy to borrow at 8% because Amazon's WACC was 8%. It is probably one of the funniest but most ill-informed posts I have ever seen and that truly is saying something.
You are one sad, odious toad. What kind of creature gave birth to you? What is some kind of weird bat?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top