• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

It's mad. He got filmed spitting in a young girls face. Then he got filmed wandering around the city in a large group during a pandemic.

How's he still got a job? It's not like there's no other RS pundit to fill his shoes.
I think it's because of the RS connections to the media, same with United that's why their players get treated differently. AVB and Mourniho have pointed this out, that because so many people in the media are RS or United fans you end up with the media favoring them. Look at the Echo, full of stories about what's going on at Liverpool, you always have somebody working there promoting RS propaganda. There was one RS journalist complaining about Everton fans singing after we drew at Anfield, I suppose it just reveals that the RS only sing when their winning. I remember United fans still singing for like 20 minutes when they were losing 3-0 to the RS. Red Star Belgrade fans stayed for 25 minutes singing after they lost to Arsenal, we sang after we lost to Chelsea in the final, it's what normal supporters do.
 


The likely end of this is likely to be quite a bitter and contracted civil war, between those who take Klopps side, and those who take the owners. I mean honestly, I can see both sides.

Some important points to note from this though. Firstly any Liverpool fan who thinks they can bounce FSG out like they did H & G is living in dreamworld. They are in much deeper than H & G were and probably need the Liverpool cash cow even more than they did. They also saw what happened to H & G and believe me, they will have put precautions in place to ensure they can't have a sale forced, at a nominal price and ensuring they get none of the money they've loaned the club back. The key thing is, at board level, with the exception of Dalglish they are all FSG loyalists. I'm not even sure if Dalglish is on the board. But essentially they are FSG loyalists, who know they will get another job in their stable if it all goes wrong. They have got a situation where they are not getting outvoted at board level.

In fighting of this nature rarely helps any football club. When Benitez started on this track, they went from 1st in February, to in the relegation zone within 18 months, with him collapsing to 8th place in the league in between. While some of the structures are stronger for them, other parts are a lot riskier now than 10 years ago. So from the outside we should welcome this divergence of opinion.

More and more journalists are turning now too. It looks coordinated. I am not sure who is leading it, whether it goes all the way back to Klopp, but it feels coordinated. Even the owners stumping up the cash for 2 CB's hasn't abetted the general feeling.

I would have said this was mad even 3 months ago, never mind a year ago, but I really can see a world where Klopp is removed from him job, or makes his position completely untenable. I always felt he was a bit quirky and nuts, but fundamentally understood the "project" Liverpool were going to. Essentially not competing on price for the top players, locating value in the market, and where a massive sale could be made, going the extra mile on a replacement. Part of that implies though, that you know most seasons you won't be competing with manchester City. You made do for a couple of years, then you will have a drop off, and the process starts again.

Somewhere along the line it looks like he has forgotten this, or he has moved on his end of the bargain. Whether that is because he has seen City initially struggle, and a side that will probably not get 100 points, and feels they could have got another title. Or whether he has has a change of heart, I'm not sure. But he doesn't look like manager who is relishing what is likely to be a rebuild job- potentially quite a substantial one, next summer. He looks the sort who will make a lot of problem if he doesn't like something as well.

They smashed world records on signing players though...

The real question FSG should be asking Klopp is ‘why did you need to buy 29 year old Thiago for 30 mill after we gave you 60 mill for Keita, 40 mill for Fabinho, 40 mill for Oxlade Chamberlain, 30 mill for Wijnaldum, 13 million for Shaqiri, Henderson and Milner were already there, Curtis Jones is coming through and you’ve let Emre Can and Lallana leave the club for nothing?.’

They’ve got enough midfielders to field three teams yet Klopp wanted another one. If you throw in Minamino as well who has played midfield it’s even more.

Carragher is going on about them needing three first team players right down their spine every window (as if any club gets that) but is that not what FSG actually did in the summer? Youth products like Brewster and Hoever were out, fringe players like Lovren Clyne Lallana gone, and Klopp was able to bring in Thiago Jota Minamino and Tsimikas for decent money. He was then supported again in the January transfer window (even though it was him who has sold Lovren Sakho Klavan recently), and he doesn’t even play the players that have been brought in. Klopp doesn’t have a leg to stand on. He’s been given absolutely everything with all his top players retained.

To be fair to Carragher (sorry) weve signed 4 first 11 players in the summer...

They spent more on an idea ball and a backup.



"The mask has slipped"

Who was that biff after Hislop?

Franck Leboeuf, ex Chelsea and France CB
 

If you think about it, had they signed Allan, Doucoure, Godfrey and James they wouldnt be in this mess and would have probably taken the title.

Instead Thiago and Jota...

They could have just spent the money on a top class centre back partner for VVD.

Their recruitment is peculiar.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top