• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

There’s a bit of that yeah but there’s also what I feel is unecessary criticism of us in comparison to similar clubs of our standing for no other reason than Liverpool don’t like us and therefore their media acolytes set an agenda. Pickford is a prime case, its fine for us to all hate him as he’s our keeper, but in the 17/18 season he’d be decent for us, coming off the back of decent form for Sunderland. Even before he went to the World Cup there was some negative press on him because the media wanted Butland Heaton or Pope to go (quite how being backup at Burnley or relegated with Stoke puts you ahead of being Everton’s number one.). During the World Cup he got panned for the goal against Belgium (might not even be his fault) before eventually getting some decent press for good performances against Columbia and especially Sweden. After the World Cup though it’s like the media couldn’t wait for him to fail, and of course his error against Origi was like they’d died and gone to heaven. Every slight error he makes now has them questioning whether he should be England number one. That’s fine but it’s the glee they do it with. Looking across the league there’s keepers with far better reputations making way more errors than him (e.g Lloris). Yet they’re barely being mentioned. Same with bad tackles, ive never heard one mentioned as much as Pickford’s (and Pickfords was accidental!).

I’m all for getting bad coverage when we deserve it but last time I looked we were having a decent season still in the hunt for Europe and the FA cup whilst other teams threw the domestic trophies. There’s always a feeling though that the media would enjoy another implosion from us. Whereas the likes of Leicester, Villa, West Ham, you don’t see anywhere near the same level of mockery and criticism of the club or individual players.

I've said it loads of times with Pickford, that he wasn't my 1st choice and I've never been sold on him. I also think there was a window where he was criticised by Everton fans before the media piped in. That's not the issue now. I understand for some Evertonians he won't be forgiven for what happened at Anfield, and that he backed it up with Newcastle away (in a lot of ways a much worse performance). However some of the criticism about him, is very tainted by this.

Nick Pope made a couple of howlers for Burnley v City and they are not mentioned. Same with Henderson V Liverpool. The two goals he conceeds are easy saves. One goes through him, and one of them is a poor dink finish that he should stand up for.

I've got no skin in the game with Pickford. But he is rightly number 1. He was England man of the tournament in the most successful campaign England have had in the last 30 years. He has earned at least the next 2 tournaments as England number , and thankfully Southgate does seem to grasp this.

If there was a prime David Seaman about, then maybe you consider his position. But there really isn't.
 


Excellent post.
I have posted before it is a media agenda and they work in concert together. It is blatantly obvious they do.
Bad press / articles / TV coverage etc about Everton generates hits & clicks from the legions of Liverpool armchair supporters in London, Dublin, Asia & beyond. That's why they do it. Good press about Everton does not. There is no such thing as reasoned, balanced, objective journalism these days. It doesn't exisit. The so called 'journalists' in the newspapers (think Oliver Holt) and on TV are just fanboy cheerleaders for their own clubs (think Carragher & Neville). They play out the media script and agenda to serve their own purpose. Liverpool & United equals good. Everton & City equals bad. That's the business model. Just you wait till you win something or take Liverpool's place in the top four. The bad press will increase by x100 and I'm not joking. It's relentless. It's just so transparent it's a joke. The bias is not even subtle or implicit. It is blatant and explicit (think SKY TV and the BBC). You just have to let it go and not let it get you down, because that's exactly why they do it. Once you eventually get your head around that, you can sit back, laugh at them and enjoy it. However, that journey is not an easy one to take...

You're not wrong on that. Soem of the stuff about City, not even as a City fan, is ridiculous. Look I'm not a City lover either, I've always felt Everton were at it's core a much bigger club. I got frustrated with City's chase of Lescott and loved going to your ground and winning regularly as much as anyone. I'm not some biased pro-City merchant.

Some of the criticism is absolutely ludicrous though. Phrases like financial "doping". It's an insult to actual doping to start inserting it into spaces it doesn't belong. I remember asking someone what "financial doping" meant- and essentially what it meant was spending money. Spending money is now viewed as cheating. City don't even spend that much, United and Liverpool spend more than City on wages, and in United's case transfers. And they are the clubs that bang on about it the most. If a fella who supports Burnley, or Brighton or whoever says it's unfair, I can kind of understand that, but you've got fans from two teams who spend more money, complaining about anoter who invests in line with them. And they have the audacity to make out it deserves the same candor as "doping".

I mean I was critical of how much City, United, Liverpool, Chelsea spent. However you can't differentiate between them. You also have to acknwoledge spending money is not a crime as comparable as cheating by using illegal drugs.

The other bit of it, is sponsorships. So like United and Liverpool gets sponsors partially through connections they make, the fact their owners and senior execs will know people on other boards etc- the old you scratch my back I scratch your back kind of thing. Thats considered sacrosanct. But when a brown person (and lets be honest here, a lot of the criticism comes down to that as well- good old fashioned racism) wants to do the same, it's again beyond the pale.

The entire business eco system we live under exists due to shareholder investment. It's not an optional extra, it's a central part of what makes the capitalist economy we live in function. Shareholders will invest profits and funds into a business, with the aim of building a successful company. It pushes innovation, quality etc. Yet in football, the powers that be seem to have ruled it should be made illegal. Absolutely crackers.

Objectively, the best thing that happened to the PL was Abramovich. The leagues was about to tank at that point and fall behind. The 2nd best thing was City's takeover. Both of them put so much money into the football eco structure, they have allowed it to become the best league in the world, which everyone has benefitted from. That this level of analysis is beyond most people on the edges of football- but who are all happy to take their cut of the bigger cake thats been created is highly hypocritical. Your FSG's and your Glaziers are takers. They suck out of football. They don't put anything in.
 
Under today’s stupid rules it probably was a pen, it’s the blatant dive that draws attention to it though and that never gets a mention, which is the most annoying thing

RS mate was saying that Salah has to exaggerate when he's fouled now to make sure he gets the free - kicks because of all the times he's been fouled and tries to stay on his feet refs are giving him nothing. I nearly fell off my chair with laughter when he said "tries to stay on his feet"
 
Under today’s stupid rules it probably was a pen, it’s the blatant dive that draws attention to it though and that never gets a mention, which is the most annoying thing
It's not though. The opposition player touched his hand, that's it. He didn't pull him back or yank his shirt, he literally touched his hand. Under any normal circumstance you don't even feel that, never mind have your entire body collapse to the floor in agony. I get it though, the referee wants you to think that he's seen Salah be grabbed and that's why he awarded the penalty. But that didn't happen.
 

Salah came across as a likeable bloke and with his phenomenal numbers had every chance of being remembered as a PL legend. Now however, he will be remembered by the majority of fans and possibly even the media with the way that it’s finally being recognised as nothing more than a diver.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top