Using numbers instead of positions

Status
Not open for further replies.

WA Toffee

Player Valuation: £40m
Can someone help me here. It seems people think they are cool by referring to positions by a shirt numbers. Fine in concept, but given that there are so many tactical formations now, I really can't get my head around how it works now.

For example, is a "number 10" the same role in a 442 as it is in a 433 or a 4231 or a 343? What about a "traditional number 7". Is that different based on the formation or are we going to shoehorn an obselete position into a modern line up?

Or are people just trying to be hipsters and proving that they don't really understand football at all?
 

I class a number 10 as a link up player, someone who will drop and make things happen, they can play in any formation. in 442 they just drop behind the number 9 to open doors.
 

I see a number 10 as the link between midfield and strikers, 4 and 5 etc are traditionally centre backs, the new one seems to be the number 6 which sounds like a defensive midfielder
 

Can someone help me here. It seems people think they are cool by referring to positions by a shirt numbers. Fine in concept, but given that there are so many tactical formations now, I really can't get my head around how it works now.

For example, is a "number 10" the same role in a 442 as it is in a 433 or a 4231 or a 343? What about a "traditional number 7". Is that different based on the formation or are we going to shoehorn an obselete position into a modern line up?

Or are people just trying to be hipsters and proving that they don't really understand football at all?

It's been a thing for years and years and years grandad.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top