We wouldn’t have been any worse off in our performances than we are now and besides, with the appropriate advice and guidance, the Board would have selected the right man for the job, preferably before the end of the season.
Anybody who believes that sam is the way forward, is just deluding themselves IMHO, of course.
The performances might not have been any better but I very much doubt we would have had that little upturn in fortune between Hammers at home and Baggies away which pulled us clear of the bottom three and, remarkably, into the top half.
And I am absolutely certain we would not have come from two down at home to Watford happen Koeman was still in charge.
Koeman needed to go.
He needed to go when he did go.....if not before.
It is never too early to do the right thing.
And unlike your good self, I would have very little faith in the board selecting the right man for the job, given their record over the past eighteen months.
Koeman hired and millions paid to Saints as compo, millions offered to Watford for the flavour of t’ month and finally going back, cap in hand, to Sam whom had already been interviewed and presumably discounted.
Because the “appropriate advice and guidance” seems to come from Walsh
Even now I am nervous about the next appointment, whether it be this coming May or the next May.
That we ended up with Sam is a whole nother argument.
Sam is most certainly not “the way forward” but that is nowt to do with whether or not firing Koeman at the time was the right thing to do, nay the only thing to do IMO......successor in place or not.