Farhad Moshiri

People75 · November 11, 2017

bring the ghost on said:
I wish we did mate, mate.

The papers say, we got 15 new players in, this current transfer. But yes, many if them was midfielders. Soo in that regard .

bring the ghost on · November 11, 2017

People75 said:
The papers say, we got 15 new players in, this current transfer. But yes, many if them was midfielders. Soo in that regard .

Yep, mostly Number 10s.

davek · November 11, 2017

Megatron said:
WTF are these Paradise Papers?

Leaked documents from off shore accounts.

Last Sunday Usmanov was said to have been using an IOM company to cloud the issue over who exactly owns EFC. Basically it made Moshiri look like a gofer in a crombie.

@MoutsGoat

AndyC · November 11, 2017

davek said:
Leaked documents from off shore accounts.

Last Sunday Usmanov was said to have been using an IOM company to cloud the issue over who exactly owns EFC. Basically it made Moshiri look like a gofer in a crombie.

@MoutsGoat

And the claims have been refuted and the Guardian published that they'd seen evidence of everything being kosher.

To my mind, the club should be demanding an apology if not a full retraction of the claims made as true or false, they're damaging to the name of the club.

ijjysmith · November 11, 2017

AndyC said:
And the claims have been refuted and the Guardian published that they'd seen evidence of everything being kosher.

To my mind, the club should be demanding an apology if not a full retraction of the claims made as true or false, they're damaging to the name of the club.

They won't though will they? They'll just sit there and meekly let it all just die down.

The Everton Way.

Eggs · November 11, 2017

AndyC said:
And the claims have been refuted and the Guardian published that they'd seen evidence of everything being kosher.

To my mind, the club should be demanding an apology if not a full retraction of the claims made as true or false, they're damaging to the name of the club.

..absolutely, Andy. Saying that, it would be funny if Usmanov officially came on board.

davek · November 11, 2017

AndyC said:
And the claims have been refuted and the Guardian published that they'd seen evidence of everything being kosher.

To my mind, the club should be demanding an apology if not a full retraction of the claims made as true or false, they're damaging to the name of the club.

The evidence the Guardian turned up was basically a classic example of the movement of money between bank accounts from one person to another's and back again. Even the tone of the piece was sceptical about what they were being told was there in terms of a paper trail.

It all rests on whether you accept that Moshiri's source of wealth is independent of Usmanov or not.

davek · November 11, 2017

ijjysmith said:
They won't though will they? They'll just sit there and meekly let it all just die down.

The Everton Way.

They wont because they wont want further examination.

ijjysmith · November 11, 2017

davek said:
They wont because they wont want further examination.

And that.

OnlyBlueWillDo · November 11, 2017

Moshiri is the best thing to happen to this club since we last won the league title, any Evertonian with half a brain can see that, he is the last person to blame for our poor start to the season, he only wants the best for us, and his deeds while here shouts that for those who are deaf to it.

fandjango · November 12, 2017

People75 said:
No. Selling Lukaku, with no replacement, having no striker or manager, and turning Everton in to a mess, is something i enjoy.

Let's keep him. He has been a huge succes, for the club soo far. And contributing millions on players. He is not a leach, at all.

Fine man he is

And you think any owner could have kept lukaku
He was gone no matter what
The loss of lukaku is not down to Moshiri
Neither is the lack of a replacement
That's down to Walsh and The chairman and Koeman putting all their eggs in the Giroud basket
I believe Giroud came here took one look at Koeman attitude and ran a mile
Moshiri .... still to convince me 100% but he is nit to blame for the striker situation

People75 · November 12, 2017

fandjango said:
And you think any owner could have kept lukaku
He was gone no matter what
The loss of lukaku is not down to Moshiri
Neither is the lack of a replacement
That's down to Walsh and The chairman and Koeman putting all their eggs in the Giroud basket
I believe Giroud came here took one look at Koeman attitude and ran a mile
Moshiri .... still to convince me 100% but he is nit to blame for the striker situation

im just going to skip, the first part, about the Lukaku sale.

Moshiri brought in Koeman, and he could have brought in a striker, if he was willing.

fandjango · November 13, 2017

People75 said:
im just going to skip, the first part, about the Lukaku sale.

Moshiri brought in Koeman, and he could have brought in a striker, if he was willing.

Oh dear if you so so need to be right enjoy but your arguments and premise are ridiculous