Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 110 7.8%

  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,298 92.2%
  • Total voters
    1,408
Status
Not open for further replies.


People75 said:
I mean, if you don't think there are any other or better choices, than Moshiri, then that's fine.
Click to expand...

1. When did I ever say that?

2. It's not about whether there are "better choices" out there. You don't fire an owner and pick a new one. The owner needs to buy the club.

3. My point was that you said he has no experience in running a club. Very, very few owners have had experience in running other clubs before they purchased the club which they own.
 
People75 said:
There are a lot of speculations going around. My point is, that he seem less willing to spend, and more willing to keep the numbers to him self.
Click to expand...

Well that is rubbish.

We had a positive net spend. It may not have been a huge net spend, but it was a positive net spend.

Any monies received by the club for transfers belong to the club. It doesn't belong to Moshiri and he doesn't "keep it to himself", unless it is distributed in dividends (and even then, he owns under 50% of the club at present, so why would he do this?).

He would clearly rather re-invest the money and build its capital value than have any short-term personal gains.
 
bring the ghost on said:
1. When did I ever say that?

2. It's not about whether there are "better choices" out there. You don't fire an owner and pick a new one. The owner needs to buy the club.

3. My point was that you said he has no experience in running a club. Very, very few owners have had experience in running other clubs before they purchased the club which they own.
Click to expand...
Ok. But some owners who buy a club, without previous experience, do actualy get succes. Moshiri, seem more interested in the money, he can gain, rather than making good replacements, from fx. Lukaku. It's a bad buisness plan, for a football club.
 
People75 said:
Ok. But some owners who buy a club, without previous experience, do actualy get succes. Moshiri, seem more interested in the money, he can gain, rather than making good replacements, from fx. Lukaku. It's a bad buisness plan, for a football club.
Click to expand...

See above.

Any monies received by the club for transfers belong to the club. It doesn't belong to Moshiri and he doesn't "keep it to himself", unless it is distributed in dividends (and even then, he owns under 50% of the club at present, so why would he do this?).

He would clearly rather re-invest the money and build its capital value than have any short-term personal gains.
 
bring the ghost on said:
Well that is rubbish.

We had a positive net spend. It may not have been a huge net spend, but it was a positive net spend.

Any monies received by the club for transfers belong to the club. It doesn't belong to Moshiri and he doesn't "keep it to himself", unless it is distributed in dividends (and even then, he owns under 50% of the club at present, so why would he do this?).

He would clearly rather re-invest the money and build its capital value than have any short-term personal gains.
Click to expand...
How do you know that? I think we bouth are talking, from our observations, during the transfer window. Soo very little is known, besides the fact, that we did not over spend, and he did not deliver, when it came to spending big, on a striker. Well good for him, he did not need to use any money. Perhaps the interests, on the Lukaku money, will buy us a striker. Now that he is not willing to do soo, with his own money. I know, it's far out.
 

bring the ghost on said:
See above.

Any monies received by the club for transfers belong to the club. It doesn't belong to Moshiri and he doesn't "keep it to himself", unless it is distributed in dividends (and even then, he owns under 50% of the club at present, so why would he do this?).

He would clearly rather re-invest the money and build its capital value than have any short-term personal gains.
Click to expand...
Unless he is a greedy buisness man, who give a s... about other than him self. These people exist, you know
 
bring the ghost on said:
1. When did I ever say that?

2. It's not about whether there are "better choices" out there. You don't fire an owner and pick a new one. The owner needs to buy the club.

3. My point was that you said he has no experience in running a club. Very, very few owners have had experience in running other clubs before they purchased the club which they own.
Click to expand...
By the way, sorry i misunderstood your point. I did not mean to misquote you. Thank you for bearing with me.
 
People75 said:
How do you know that? I think we bouth are talking, from our observations, during the transfer window. Soo very little is known, besides the fact, that we did not over spend, and he did not deliver, when it came to spending big, on a striker. Well good for him, he did not need to use any money. Perhaps the interests, on the Lukaku money, will buy us a striker. Now that he is not willing to do soo, with his own money. I know, it's far out.
Click to expand...

Actually, we know for a fact that Giroud was at Finch Farm because Koeman said so and has blamed his own inability to convince him to join as a factor in his demise. The money was there. Koeman and Walsh failed, not Moshiri.
 
Paradise papers, claim that Moshiri did not buy Everton, for his own money, plus he still had shares in Arsenal, after the take over.

If that is true, we are facing some serious trouble.

Deagging Everton through, the media like this, instead of just paying the damn 85mill, that was the asking price.

It's too corupt and greedy, for my likeing.

Like i said, perhaps he should find a lesser league, where these things are not investigated in public. Like eastern Europe, Turkey and other corupt countries.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top