http://www.transferleague.co.uk/everton/english-football-teams/everton-transfers
Not saying its 100% correct, but there you go.
- Status
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/everton/english-football-teams/everton-transfers
Not saying its 100% correct, but there you go.
The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
We will have a commercial partner for the stadium, quite a few no doubt, but the main one will be for the naming rights. Even if they pay 5 million a year, which maybe about right when we first start the contract (inflation will see that rise as time goes on) that's 200 million over 40 years to go towards the stadium.
We have already got diluted ownership, no one is going to take risks for small gain of owning 10% etc. The funding and debt of the stadium is not an issue, it is far better to have static small payments than try and cripple yourself with short term lending models that Arsenal and now by the look of it Spurs are using.
Tell me exactly which club he has wrecked?
Kenshin
Player Valuation: £40m
Did we? I thought it was around 45 after the window shut and that did include 2 deals worth 45 million falling through in terms of outgoings.
Either way that 60 million was planned to be a lot lower than it was, which still makes it sell to buy. Even the tv money is worth more than that. If we spent 60 then that was by accident as we had all intention of selling at least niasse and Barkley on deadline day
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
The club will be looking to borrow from them rather than being partners?
Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
I think a commercial partner in the stadium might fall foul of LCC, I take it though you mean liket he Arsenal and Manc City jobbos. As for your other idea do not think Moshiri or BK would like to dilute their holdings unless they had no voting rights, kept off the board which would probably be unacceptable, bit like Usmanov and Arsenal.
So methinks your suggestions would be nonstarters.
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
...only because the major shareholder's objectives are not entirely in keeping with whats best for the club long term.
CRIMHEAD
Player Valuation: £40m
It's not even close. It counts Vlasic twice for example. I mean, that's pretty bad.
bitter-no-better
Player Valuation: £25m
Koemans transfer dealings where 60 mill net.
Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
Can't blame them Dave, they own a football club but at the end of the day it is a business not a charity.
Have to say Dave for me there was no alternative but Moshiri coming who thus effectively rescued the club from long term decline. BK etc did noy have the funds. You talked of an American Consortium but I seem to recall they were not exactly a sound proposition.
It also omits the add ons for certain players, its not correct, if anything its under, rather than over.
I didnt use that for my figure.
85m NET, if somebody wishes to disprove that figure, they can come up with their own.
Market trader
Player Valuation: £1m
Interesting to see what Usmanov thought about Arsenal's decision to fund their stadium by loans loaded on the club:
'The previous decision by the Board to fund the building of the Emirates Stadium with long-term debt was, we believe, certainly not about self-financing. If it had been, it would have been funded through a mixture of debt and non-dividend equity. Instead it allowed, in our view, the major shareholders of the time, who happened to all be Board directors, to load the Club with a liability, to benefit from increased future revenue streams and consequent increase in the value of their holdings, whilst avoiding dilution of their equity. The Board of the time then appeared to pursue a policy of increasing ticket prices and squeezing the fans to cover the short term cost increases which allowed them to bridge until all of these shareholders and Board directors sold 100% of their holdings and cashed out at vast profits.'
Paragraph 9 in: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/18725835
In other words the board sold out making large profits after leaving the club with a large debt from the building of the stadium. Whether Moshiri and the board intend to do the same remains to be seen.
'The previous decision by the Board to fund the building of the Emirates Stadium with long-term debt was, we believe, certainly not about self-financing. If it had been, it would have been funded through a mixture of debt and non-dividend equity. Instead it allowed, in our view, the major shareholders of the time, who happened to all be Board directors, to load the Club with a liability, to benefit from increased future revenue streams and consequent increase in the value of their holdings, whilst avoiding dilution of their equity. The Board of the time then appeared to pursue a policy of increasing ticket prices and squeezing the fans to cover the short term cost increases which allowed them to bridge until all of these shareholders and Board directors sold 100% of their holdings and cashed out at vast profits.'
Paragraph 9 in: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/18725835
In other words the board sold out making large profits after leaving the club with a large debt from the building of the stadium. Whether Moshiri and the board intend to do the same remains to be seen.
thesniffer1878
Player Valuation: £500k
I think he will help us get a bigger name in as manager.
CynicalBlue
Player Valuation: £8m
It seems pretty accurate that aside, it also highlights some the dross we've signed over the years.
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
