You'll have to excuse the law student in me, but your whole stance seems rather illogical, to be honest. You sit on this board and moan about Koeman and support Martinez, basically using the 72 points we accrued in 13/14 as the backbone to make your case. My question to you is that did you not witness the regression or the collapse of Roberto's tenure here? 72/5th ---> 47/11 ----> 47/11. So I'm confused by your logic. You can't argue that Martinez's Everton didn't severely regress and that he, as the manager, was largely the one at fault. Furthermore, if you look at Martinez's record as a manager as a whole, the 72 points seems an aberration and not the norm. So what exactly is your stance? You think if Everton kept Martinez they would have rebounded from 11/11 in the past 2 years. Lastly, who do you fault for the collapse? Players or Roberto? Seems as if you would be pleased that Koeman has taken essentially the same team that Martinez had and turned them from 11 to 7th and will finish with an expected return of +14ish? points in the table.
