Sell Jags? Eh?

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/09-10/comment/fan/14922.html?

Probably sits behind me in the Street End - stacks of GCSE's in this part of the ground.

Just thought I would bring it to peoples attention. You haven't seen me.

sHa_dielaughing.gif
Please make it stop
sHa_dielaughing.gif


Bravo.
sHa_clap2.gif
 

That Dave lid was responded to nicely enough, despite being very wrong but then came out and threw a few rip bombs.

The crowd are now getting angry.

My favourite internet people are the ones like Andrew Edwards on there. To the point like.
 

Generally you can safely call the product of a fertilization a "fruit". (We
routinely, in the supermarket, call the structure bearing fruits "fruit").
Generally fruits will germinate into plants which will again flower,
offering another opportunity for fertilization. (Note that bananas we find
in the store bear tiny almost-remnants of seeds which will not
germinate...in the wild, banana "fruits" have seeds (fruits, being the
products of fertilization) which are much larger which will germinate). If
one discusses a part of a plant which is not the direct product of a
fertilization nor the structure bearing it, then one could safely call the
item an herb. For example, basil leaves are vegetative structures not
specifically the result of a fertilization and are most easily described as
herbs.

I do not have an adequate definition for 'vegetable', but my feeling for its
routine meaning is any part of a plant consumed whether a stem (celery), a
leaf (lettuce), a root or tuber (radish, or potato, respectively), and in
some cases the fruit of fertilization or structures bearing them (cucumbers,
yes-tomatoes). Add to this such items as mushrooms (basidiocarps of fungi)
and you get the idea....the term vegetable has come to mean most anything
which is not animal or mineral which we find in the 'produce' section of the
supermarket. Thus, the term vegetable has somewhat lost a botanical
usefulness in that there are more specific terms to use depending on the
particular structure being discussed.

Note that there are specific botanical definitions for berries which can be
found in any good plant classification text; you can see this is essential,
for example, in distinguishing between raspberries, blueberries, and
tomatoes (also berries).
 
Only monsters consider tomato a fruit.

NO, the dictonary considers it one.
1 : the usually large rounded typically red or yellow pulpy berry of an herb (genus Lycopersicon) of the nightshade family native to South America
2 : a plant that produces tomatoes; especially : one (Lycopersicon esculentum syn. L. lycopersicum) that is a tender perennial widely cultivated as an annual for its edible fruit

It IS a fruit. Try to call it a vegtable all you want, but it wont make it one.
 

Generally you can safely call the product of a fertilization a "fruit". (We
routinely, in the supermarket, call the structure bearing fruits "fruit").
Generally fruits will germinate into plants which will again flower,
offering another opportunity for fertilization. (Note that bananas we find
in the store bear tiny almost-remnants of seeds which will not
germinate...in the wild, banana "fruits" have seeds (fruits, being the
products of fertilization) which are much larger which will germinate). If
one discusses a part of a plant which is not the direct product of a
fertilization nor the structure bearing it, then one could safely call the
item an herb. For example, basil leaves are vegetative structures not
specifically the result of a fertilization and are most easily described as
herbs.

I do not have an adequate definition for 'vegetable', but my feeling for its
routine meaning is any part of a plant consumed whether a stem (celery), a
leaf (lettuce), a root or tuber (radish, or potato, respectively), and in
some cases the fruit of fertilization or structures bearing them (cucumbers,
yes-tomatoes). Add to this such items as mushrooms (basidiocarps of fungi)
and you get the idea....the term vegetable has come to mean most anything
which is not animal or mineral which we find in the 'produce' section of the
supermarket. Thus, the term vegetable has somewhat lost a botanical
usefulness in that there are more specific terms to use depending on the
particular structure being discussed.

Note that there are specific botanical definitions for berries which can be
found in any good plant classification text; you can see this is essential,
for example, in distinguishing between raspberries, blueberries, and
tomatoes (also berries).

:lol:
 
Yeah, well, I googled and found this:

By U.S. tariff laws, a tomato is considered a vegetable. The applicable law defined produce by its use and not its scientific classification. And from a culinary point of view, a tomato is a vegetable.

And since the USA own the world it means I'm dead right.


awaits a tag team spandexed bodyslam*
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top