Club GM 4-1-17

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure I understand this quote entirely.....

"We expect to announce a 300% increase in aggregate shirt sponsorship next season, via partly a sleeve patch sponsor AND a sponsorship deal for Finch Farm."

Does that mean a replacement for Chang with a shirt front and sleeve logo or the patch in addition to a new sponsor to replace Chang?
I would add how does a sponsorship deal for FF fall under the umbrella of aggregate shirt sponsorship?
Perhaps he's been misquoted here.
 

it wasn't as far as everything i've read pal

300% , not inc sleeve

No the 3 fold increase is the shirt sponsorship only. Here's the quote.



It does appear to be over 5 years though so it might not even be a 100% increase

Well the figures are out as a 300% increase on our already £5mill should = £20mill.

However the £75mill deals agreed over 5 years is £15mill per year which isnt really a 300% increase (which is why I am assuming that they are including the yet to be agreed sleeve logo)
 
So RMF would appear to being drawn down to the extent of 22.5 mil by May, if not already.
Would also point out that this borrowing stream can continue as it is secured on 17/18 payments.
Not too surprised, but disappointed.
 

Well the figures are out as a 300% increase on our already £5mill should = £20mill.

However the £75mill deals agreed over 5 years is £15mill per year which isnt really a 300% increase (which is why I am assuming that they are including the yet to be agreed sleeve logo)

Is there an actual 300% quote? The above 3 fold quote is from Elstone and relates solely to shirt sponsorship

Edit: just seen it above, that's definitely just the shirt sponsorship
 

Well the figures are out as a 300% increase on our already £5mill should = £20mill.

However the £75mill deals agreed over 5 years is £15mill per year which isnt really a 300% increase (which is why I am assuming that they are including the yet to be agreed sleeve logo)

Because we don't own Finch Farm, we have to pay a percentage to the council. That will be the difference.
 
I suspect sustainability was in reference to revenue performance .
You must be frothing tonight.
Frothing? About what? Joe Anderson doing the Joe Anderson Il Duce act and promising the world and delivering nothing? Moshiris nonsense about "establishing Everton" (erm, we're already established mate, this isn't 'kin Swansea City or some no mark outfit)? The kenwrightisms about lads buying him ale?

FFS, it was like an AGM from 2001 when Bill and his gang had the KD roadshow up and running....in fact at least the KD scheme was a reality, unlike the BMD mirage which Peel will finesse out the door in good time.

Wake up. It's the same brown stuff different day.
 
Frothing? About what? Joe Anderson doing the Joe Anderson Il Duce act and promising the world and delivering nothing? Moshiris nonsense about "establishing Everton" (erm, we're already established mate, this isn't 'kin Swansea City or some no mark outfit)? The kenwrightisms about lads buying him ale?

FFS, it was like an AGM from 2001 when Bill and his gang had the KD roadshow up and running....in fact at least the KD scheme was a reality, unlike the BMD mirage which Peel will finesse out the door in good time.

Wake up. It's the same brown stuff different day.

Your routine is boring.
 
I
Yes - if Koeman is a huge success her then Barca is almost inevitably his next move. If he is a failure he will be sacked and probably return to Holland. You're right about Walsh tooand his fate will be inextricably linked to Koeman's performance.
I sincerely hope RK is one day named Barcelona manager. This can only mean he has had success at Everton.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top