You're entirely missing my point because you're attempting to tug the conversation towards Moshiri's actions or intentions - that's off topic.
Look back, I have not said he has done anything as you may suggest, nor have I implied it. Yet neither have I said he has been inactive.
I simply mentioned that perhaps the said £100m figure bounded about may have come from a reference to an overall initial investment.
He may have simply bought shares, which you're right to say isn't an investment. He may have paid off some of the debt or bought some land.
I don't actually know and to be fair neither do many people, hence why there may be the original confusion with regards to the £100m.
And that was my point - the £100 transfer figure. Not about Moshiri investing or what you want to imply yet you've decide to go on off an tangent.
But I'd like to ask, apart from what Esk has told you how do you know what Moshiri has invested or not invested into the club?
You've got a gripe with the current situation of the club and that is clear...