Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 110 7.8%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,298 92.2%

  • Total voters
    1,408
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you buy a club tell every one you want to make it great Again. Buy a new goalie and a defensive midfielder from the championship and sell the biggest young talent the club have had for 10 years you deserve people ask questions about your real intentions.

Furthermore you must expect people to ask questions if you spend the profit from the sale of the biggest defensive talent since Rio Ferdinand on a two year contract for Ashley Williams and Bolasie who is a lower League player with a decent season for Palace...

After Barnsley got their share, agents fees etc that is what the Stones Money will bring us
 

Wow, that is a stretch. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. Calling out people for wild theories and then chucking one of your own in, in the very same post, is some going.

Dont think its a wild theory. It has a certain logic to it. We now know he was chatting to Bill 18 months before he turned up, so he knew enough about our commercial "deals", wage levels, and the new rules re SSTC/TV money.

Why would he think its a good idea to sell a valuable player then, when he knew he would NEED to sell one this summer?
 
You have not a fragment more insight into what's going on at an executive level at Everton than me so please spare me your patronising responses.

Thats far enough, and sorry, didnt mean to sound patronising. But, the reason for selling Stones was nothing to do with generating cash for transfer fees.
 
So what is more likely, what @roydo posted or that we're selling Lukaku alongside Stones and spending less than half what we got for them?

People need to get a grip.
Let's look at what has happened so far.

Out

Stones £47.5M

In

Stekelenberg nominal
Gueye £7.1M
Williams (maybe) £12M

Which argument currently has the best real evidence? Not ITK bluster?
 

Dont think its a wild theory. It has a certain logic to it. We now know he was chatting to Bill 18 months before he turned up, so he knew enough about our commercial "deals", wage levels, and the new rules re SSTC/TV money.

Why would he think its a good idea to sell a valuable player then, when he knew he would NEED to sell one this summer?
Only if we intend to raise wages by more than £7M, I'm not sure we are going to do that anymore.
 

The problem is that a lot of people got carried away with we were going to sign this manager, this world class player, spend loads of money, basically be the new Man City when that was never going to happen. Pretty sure that was never promised either
 
Let's look at what has happened so far.

Out

Stones £47.5M

In

Stekelenberg nominal
Gueye £7.1M
Williams (maybe) £12M

Which argument currently has the best real evidence? Not ITK bluster?

If you believe we're signing no one else then I guess you're right. Add Bolasie to the IN list (regardless of whether you think it's a good buy or not), and that's the Stones money pretty much gone already.

I guess we'll have to wait and see who was right in a couple of weeks.
 
The problem is that a lot of people got carried away with we were going to sign this manager, this world class player, spend loads of money, basically be the new Man City when that was never going to happen. Pretty sure that was never promised either

We know we are not "New City".. problem is we are turning into a new Sunderland under Roy Keane wasting 80m on average players

I bet you Barkley and Lukaku will have a good talk with their agents in the next couple of days and it will not be about signing a new contract...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top