orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
Can't believe no-one's pointed out Mata is perfect for us, he fulfils two requirements in one. Man U and Chelsea reject.
And former Player of the Year, World Cup and European Championship winner
Can't believe no-one's pointed out Mata is perfect for us, he fulfils two requirements in one. Man U and Chelsea reject.
And former Player of the Year, World Cup and European Championship winner
Mata is emerging on 'Football Whispers' that new weird site that sky are using which groups likelihood of rumours happening
Shares an agent with Funes Mori does Mata as well, so easy as hell to sound him out on the sly about his interest
hows keane a complete tool?
What position does he play though, i just don't think he has anything like nailed down a proper position. he seems to be a bit of a utility man, ok at some master at nothing.
Phil Neville MK2. Obviously a better player but you get the drift.
Stealing that!The guy just spits his dummy too much. I don't accept that from my 7 year old daughter, never mind a well paid professional. Seems to talk utter spag bol ocks as well.
I just don't like the guy.
Only winding you up mateHaha, no...
A canny few of those are emerging talent in the Bundesliga.
I catch those games as often as possible as I have family over there and I love watching those games more than Premier League ones.
Horrified by Mata on the left shouts, would be a crime against football, if it happened at all.
This is what is confusing me about it a bit. I'd be surprised (and sad) if he was bought to take the central or right sided spots from Ross or Del respectively.
Mata did play on the left much earlier in his career but has I think come out and said recently that he wants to play centrally. I don't get it. Cracking player but no idea what the plan would be.
Griffiths has a better record than Larrson? Sign him up Ronald!!
i think an evertonless lukaku would mean finding a way to score without having to rely so much on 1 player meaning that the players are under less pressure to give the ball to the "main man" and maybe have more freedom to express themselves and have shots at goalWho mate? Kone? That is all we had, and naismith. Both had runs up front pretty much as well alongside rom and neither scored more than a couple of goals.
I would disagree that goals would have been replaced also, how many games did we score because of lukaku rather than in spite of him? how many times his strengths on the pitch led him to score rather than a simple tap in from 5 yards?
Think you give kone more credit than he deserves mate. Kone would never have scored nearly as many for us, and we probably would have lost a few more games as a result of it.