If he'd been set a specific target and failed to achieve it in 2 out of 3 years I think it would be remiss not to at least consider sacking him, yes.Exactly, so you would sack a manager for those 3 points ??
Fine margins work both ways, and if we were only 3 points ahead of the teams 2/3 places below is then what would be the difference?
For all of my criticism of him I genuinely don't want him to be sacked, but I think another finish of 10th or lower would be simply unacceptable. We all have our own cut off points but for me consecutive bottom half finishes with the money he's spent and players he inherited would be a bridge too far.








