Little Ralphy
Player Valuation: £15m
Agree.
But the point of debate was more what is the alternative to buying these younger players?
Within our pay structure, the likes of Townsend/Rhodes/Adebayor/Shelvey are the alternative. Proven (for the most part) 6or7/10 players who know the league. Every now and then they will have a very good game, but more often than note they will hit the "decent" performance level.
So the choice is:
Continue to buy and progress the likes of Lukaku, Deulofeu, Stones, Barkley - genuine top talents who will have days of 5 or 6/10 because of the inconsistency of youth but will also have lots of good days where their talent shines through. Yes we won't keep all of them but as long as the side is progressing and we are replacing them with better (more experienced) players then we are on a the right path.
or.
We bolster the squad with the likes of the above who have little or no re-sale value and will guide us to the coveted 7th place trophy. We've done this approach before, remember, under Moyes (not that he did this by choice, it must be said).
We cannot afford 28 year old Lukakus. So it really is a choice between the two. Youth with their fearless approach but infuriating inconsistency or consistent average footballers.
I'm not sure anyone is actually debating the policy of buying young. I think people are saying that's not the excuse for the poor performances.
To put it simply, I think anyone who has watched any of our games must see that we're far too open and allow the opposition to advance up the pitch and create chances far too easily. That's not an age issue, that's the way the side is set up to play.
It's been 18 months now of this and not much has changed, except now we only seem capable of beating the really poor sides. I fully expect him to be given til the end of the season, but at that point we need to be severing all ties.
Delusion. Roberto lad, is that you?







