mightymoyes
Player Valuation: £70m
Errrm how about Stones, Galloway mate?
If your going to use Wenger bringing through Bellerin then may as well be fair
bellerin joined them at 15 and played academy football, not the same as galloway and stones
Errrm how about Stones, Galloway mate?
If your going to use Wenger bringing through Bellerin then may as well be fair
Bellerin and numerous others at Arsenal are foreign lads Arsenal cherry picked from foreign clubs' academies, that's what Wenger has been doing for years. Players like Bellerin, as good as they are, can't be compared to home grown lads like Barkley, who's obviously been at Everton since he was virtually in nappies. Not even Wilshere is from London, they literally have no one in that team who was both born locally and come through their academy. Not 1 player
bellerin joined them at 15 and played academy football, not the same as galloway and stones
Well said mate.its a fine line between everton and lower leagues for alot of youngsters.well most considering you would be lucky to get 2 or 3 from every group and that doesnt even happen regularly so you would hope that when they do go on loan they see how lucky they are to be at everton and gives them that extra incentive to push themselves to make it.We have to remember that development isn't just physical or skill related, but mental too. Maybe a loan to a team outside of the football league is a reminder of how fragile professional football can be and that a youth contract at Everton is no sign that you've made it.
The mental side is so important in progressing from a good youngster to a good senior so that may be some part of it. May not of course, but we've had so many good young players come off the rails in recent years that maybe we're trying different things to keep their heads straight.
galloway had a season of academy football as well mate once he arrived
As for Bellerin, sorry but he spent about 7 years prior to arriving at Arsenal at Barcelona - no way on earth is he a home grown talent developed by Arsenal mate, same way Fabregas wasn't their academy player either
He played for the U21s all last season, I watched him quite a few times. He's only 19 now so he wouldn't have been too old last year.i dont think galloway played a game for the academy teams, he was too old. happy to be proved wrong.
He played for the U21s all last season, I watched him quite a few times. He's only 19 now so he wouldn't have been too old last year.
Yeah he wouldn't have played in the U18s anyway because its not as high a standard as U21s. It's true there's a difference though, like Garbutt for us or Sterling for the RS who both signed at 15. I still wouldn't call them proper products of our academy though, and especially if they come from somewhere like Barca.i know he played for the u21s, watched him myself. hes 20 in march, i think he was too old for u18 football. either way he can hardly be counted as an everton product.
im not saying bellerin was all arsenals work but theres a difference to signing a 15 yr old and an 18 yr old.
Great post mate.We have to remember that development isn't just physical or skill related, but mental too. Maybe a loan to a team outside of the football league is a reminder of how fragile professional football can be and that a youth contract at Everton is no sign that you've made it.
The mental side is so important in progressing from a good youngster to a good senior so that may be some part of it. May not of course, but we've had so many good young players come off the rails in recent years that maybe we're trying different things to keep their heads straight.
I posted a wee bit back in August I think, we quietly took him on from Wrexham as he wouldn't sign a new contract with them . He's 20 I think. We loaned him to Colwyn Bay at one point. I read a good article the other day about him stoping shots from Lukaku in training. Couldn't cut paste on my iPad but will try to find it again.Is Gray a new keeper??? Can't recall seeing his name mentioned befor.
Hopefully he is boss.
Aren't they doing awful in the under 21 league, I watched the game against Exeter not one of their players looked impressive.Great post mate.
I think, especially for young players it is the mental side of it that becomes the most important. Most are technical very gifted and that can certainly be achieved in house at the academy. Likewise a lot can be done to help with physicality (weight training etc) or they can be scaffolded (eased in at fullback for example).
I think it is the mental side of things where top level English clubs really struggle. Up to under 17's English clubs are very competitive but after that we tend to lag behind. It goes hand in hand with lack of first team experience such players get.
Dealing with pressure is massive. How do you deal with playing for a team who's win bonus may be the difference between a good week or a bad week. Or where relegation or promotion may keep the kitman or tea lady in a job? In an environment where you might have 3 or 4 thousand people getting on your back if you're having a bad game?
Most academies tend to be warm, friendly and safe places to help players develop. That's what you get from Unsworth, he is very supportive. And he can be, if he loses 4 games in a row nobody is calling for him to be sacked like they do with Martinez (or lower league managers). If someone makes a mistake they might not lose their job.
This is very important, as you are dealing with children and placing undue pressure will hamper their development. As they progress into adults though you can only shield them for so long. The academy or under 21's can only provide so much. While people can say results are important nothing will ever feel like scoring the winning goal for Tranmere (which Green did last year) or playing a part in a promotion campaign like Ledson does.
All this prepares them for what happens at first team level. The comparison I would make is school. Often people finishing school at 18 will have an equally good appreciation and skills for a job as someone who has held the position. However they just lack the worldliness to get the nuances of the working world. A loan is like a stint on a minimum wage job. You're not going to learn anything technical but you learn the importance of work, how to get along with people, and get outside the secure bubble.
Of all the attributes I've seen with young players, mental attributes are the most important. You have to be very resilient. The loan process is essential to this.
It's interesting Klopp is turning his back on that model. It is yet another awful move from Liverpool. They may well win the under 21's league, but will not produce any players from doing that.
Aren't they doing awful in the under 21 league, I watched the game against Exeter not one of their players looked impressive.
This it ?I posted a wee bit back in August I think, we quietly took him on from Wrexham as he wouldn't sign a new contract with them . He's 20 I think. We loaned him to Colwyn Bay at one point. I read a good article the other day about him stoping shots from Lukaku in training. Couldn't cut paste on my iPad but will try to find it again.

Great post mate.
I think, especially for young players it is the mental side of it that becomes the most important. Most are technical very gifted and that can certainly be achieved in house at the academy. Likewise a lot can be done to help with physicality (weight training etc) or they can be scaffolded (eased in at fullback for example).
I think it is the mental side of things where top level English clubs really struggle. Up to under 17's English clubs are very competitive but after that we tend to lag behind. It goes hand in hand with lack of first team experience such players get.
Dealing with pressure is massive. How do you deal with playing for a team who's win bonus may be the difference between a good week or a bad week. Or where relegation or promotion may keep the kitman or tea lady in a job? In an environment where you might have 3 or 4 thousand people getting on your back if you're having a bad game?
Most academies tend to be warm, friendly and safe places to help players develop. That's what you get from Unsworth, he is very supportive. And he can be, if he loses 4 games in a row nobody is calling for him to be sacked like they do with Martinez (or lower league managers). If someone makes a mistake they might not lose their job.
This is very important, as you are dealing with children and placing undue pressure will hamper their development. As they progress into adults though you can only shield them for so long. The academy or under 21's can only provide so much. While people can say results are important nothing will ever feel like scoring the winning goal for Tranmere (which Green did last year) or playing a part in a promotion campaign like Ledson does.
All this prepares them for what happens at first team level. The comparison I would make is school. Often people finishing school at 18 will have an equally good appreciation and skills for a job as someone who has held the position. However they just lack the worldliness to get the nuances of the working world. A loan is like a stint on a minimum wage job. You're not going to learn anything technical but you learn the importance of work, how to get along with people, and get outside the secure bubble.
Of all the attributes I've seen with young players, mental attributes are the most important. You have to be very resilient. The loan process is essential to this.
It's interesting Klopp is turning his back on that model. It is yet another awful move from Liverpool. They may well win the under 21's league, but will not produce any players from doing that.