...do you prefer 'we go again' eddy? I bet you do.
Thanks Martin. You can get back on the monkey bars now.
Yes, you argue your point mate, and well to a degree, and as I've said, some of it I totally get. But you jump, and criticise when one view happens to oppose your own...
'Laughable caricature'. Pfffff, get me, I've achieved, ta muchly. Rich though, coming from a seemingly a chronic onanist who's blinded by the hope that we have a great manager for whom everything is currently as he wishes and working out jussssst groovy. It isn't. What are you seeing that others aren't? You're using the argument that he's mixed it all up already. Stunning. What's it achieved then? Thus it's a player issue? So why's that?
I asked you, the 3 games down the line scenario, what if? Really, what if?
And please don't suggest you're unwilling to answer a 'what if' because your ENTIRE argument is based on the same.
Oh, and respectfully, I used the phrase self-importance as you keep referencing how much you're looking forward to being 'proved right' etc after the NU game? Y'know, when we crawl back under stones etc. Back-slapping, self-importance, it runs on...
BTW, the KOPITE behaviour thing....an example of which, in my experience, is their ability to defend the undefensable. Which is EXACTLY what you're doing, as you yourself have said I believe, facts/figures etc...
That said, it's Friday, go have a Gin while I telephone some old media chums to explain the essence of being 'blinkered' to me.
Chin-chin.
You ask me what mixing it all up has achieved...when you're the one advocating it!! Dear me.
Three games down the line and we have 1 point extra? That's not even worth asking in this climate. He'd be fired I suppose. Should he be at that point? Well that would depend on whether we have a gap that's non-existent anymore. I've stated since this madness took hold that what happens below us is as important as what we do in respect of safety. I'll stick to that. We have 6 home games left...10 in all. You need to show some faith that the probably 8 points we'll need will easily be achieved...even the last 10 coughed up 7. As appalling as that is, that added to the 6 we have in hand over the bottom three would be enough to hold them off...and that is worse case scenario.
As for defending the indefensible and my Kopite behaviour thereby: I'm stepping back and calmly viewing the likely conclusion to all this. I'm astounded you believe I'm the one with the fanciful and wild analysis when there's a load on here screaming that their hair is on fire at each result.[/QUOTE
Yes, you argue your point mate, and well to a degree, and as I've said, some of it I totally get. But you jump, and criticise when one view happens to oppose your own...
'Laughable caricature'. Pfffff, get me, I've achieved, ta muchly. Rich though, coming from a seemingly a chronic onanist who's blinded by the hope that we have a great manager for whom everything is currently as he wishes and working out jussssst groovy. It isn't. What are you seeing that others aren't? You're using the argument that he's mixed it all up already. Stunning. What's it achieved then? Thus it's a player issue? So why's that?
I asked you, the 3 games down the line scenario, what if? Really, what if?
And please don't suggest you're unwilling to answer a 'what if' because your ENTIRE argument is based on the same.
Oh, and respectfully, I used the phrase self-importance as you keep referencing how much you're looking forward to being 'proved right' etc after the NU game? Y'know, when we crawl back under stones etc. Back-slapping, self-importance, it runs on...
BTW, the KOPITE behaviour thing....an example of which, in my experience, is their ability to defend the undefensable. Which is EXACTLY what you're doing, as you yourself have said I believe, facts/figures etc...
That said, it's Friday, go have a Gin while I telephone some old media chums to explain the essence of being 'blinkered' to me.
Chin-chin.
Nor is basing the idea that all is fine over a potential NEWCASTLE victory. (or any victory come to that)
And therein lies the problem then because if - as you say - he HAS mixed it up already and that hasn't worked either then, clearly, he's run out of ideas, yes? Are you really lauding a couple of minor formation alterations as him being savvy & full of acumen, worse still 'onto' the problem and addressing it such?
The format and, dare I say it, SYSTEM, needs total review & overhaul, you curious orange, you...
That made me laugh. Which is good, under the circs...
Yes, you argue your point mate, and well to a degree, and as I've said, some of it I totally get. But you jump, and criticise when one view happens to oppose your own...
'Laughable caricature'. Pfffff, get me, I've achieved, ta muchly. Rich though, coming from a seemingly a chronic onanist who's blinded by the hope that we have a great manager for whom everything is currently as he wishes and working out jussssst groovy. It isn't. What are you seeing that others aren't? You're using the argument that he's mixed it all up already. Stunning. What's it achieved then? Thus it's a player issue? So why's that?
I asked you, the 3 games down the line scenario, what if? Really, what if?
And please don't suggest you're unwilling to answer a 'what if' because your ENTIRE argument is based on the same.
Oh, and respectfully, I used the phrase self-importance as you keep referencing how much you're looking forward to being 'proved right' etc after the NU game? Y'know, when we crawl back under stones etc. Back-slapping, self-importance, it runs on...
BTW, the KOPITE behaviour thing....an example of which, in my experience, is their ability to defend the undefensable. Which is EXACTLY what you're doing, as you yourself have said I believe, facts/figures etc...
That said, it's Friday, go have a Gin while I telephone some old media chums to explain the essence of being 'blinkered' to me.
Chin-chin.
You ask me what mixing it all up has achieved...when you're the one advocating it!! Dear me.
Three games down the line and we have 1 point extra? That's not even worth asking in this climate. He'd be fired I suppose. Should he be at that point? Well that would depend on whether we have a gap that's non-existent anymore. I've stated since this madness took hold that what happens below us is as important as what we do in respect of safety. I'll stick to that. We have 6 home games left...10 in all. You need to show some faith that the probably 8 points we'll need will easily be achieved...even the last 10 coughed up 7. As appalling as that is, that added to the 6 we have in hand over the bottom three would be enough to hold them off...and that is worse case scenario.
As for defending the indefensible and my Kopite behaviour thereby: I'm stepping back and calmly viewing the likely conclusion to all this. I'm astounded you believe I'm the one with the fanciful and wild analysis when there's a load on here screaming that their hair is on fire at each result.[/QUOTE
Yes, you argue your point mate, and well to a degree, and as I've said, some of it I totally get. But you jump, and criticise when one view happens to oppose your own...
'Laughable caricature'. Pfffff, get me, I've achieved, ta muchly. Rich though, coming from a seemingly a chronic onanist who's blinded by the hope that we have a great manager for whom everything is currently as he wishes and working out jussssst groovy. It isn't. What are you seeing that others aren't? You're using the argument that he's mixed it all up already. Stunning. What's it achieved then? Thus it's a player issue? So why's that?
I asked you, the 3 games down the line scenario, what if? Really, what if?
And please don't suggest you're unwilling to answer a 'what if' because your ENTIRE argument is based on the same.
Oh, and respectfully, I used the phrase self-importance as you keep referencing how much you're looking forward to being 'proved right' etc after the NU game? Y'know, when we crawl back under stones etc. Back-slapping, self-importance, it runs on...
BTW, the KOPITE behaviour thing....an example of which, in my experience, is their ability to defend the undefensable. Which is EXACTLY what you're doing, as you yourself have said I believe, facts/figures etc...
That said, it's Friday, go have a Gin while I telephone some old media chums to explain the essence of being 'blinkered' to me.
Chin-chin.
Nor is basing the idea that all is fine over a potential NEWCASTLE victory. (or any victory come to that)
And therein lies the problem then because if - as you say - he HAS mixed it up already and that hasn't worked either then, clearly, he's run out of ideas, yes? Are you really lauding a couple of minor formation alterations as him being savvy & full of acumen, worse still 'onto' the problem and addressing it such?
The format and, dare I say it, SYSTEM, needs total review & overhaul, you curious orange, you...
That made me laugh. Which is good, under the circs...
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
