Yes or No: post WBA result should Martinez be sacked?

post WBA result: should Martinez be sacked?

  • Yes

    Votes: 238 37.4%
  • No

    Votes: 399 62.6%

  • Total voters
    637
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
And it's what we all expected, and if we were still playing now I doubt we would have scored.

I want to know why, when we have the ball in the final 3rd, we don't have a deep running midfielder, you know just to try and pull someone out if position to create a bit of space.

Instead everyone stands in the same position snap just moving the ball left to right, and back again. It's lacklustre and to easy to defend, as proven last night and in many other games this season


We were playing a Pulis bus. A cannon would struggle to penetrate it, let alone a creative midfielder. I did think that John Stones pulled a couple of players out of position when he pushed forward, an option maybe we didn't exploit enough. Martinez has gotten things woefully wrong a lot of times this season, but last night wasn't one of those times.
 

Me, I believe in a bit of loyalty.

DOqLXrt.gif





JagiDistin
Ferguson & Osman the axis of plotters

Oh Davek, you josh even too much for little ole me.
 
We were playing a Pulis bus. A cannon would struggle to penetrate it, let alone a creative midfielder. I did think that John Stones pulled a couple of players out of position when he pushed forward, an option maybe we didn't exploit enough. Martinez has gotten things woefully wrong a lot of times this season, but last night wasn't one of those times.

Movement would have helped a lot, you can't expect to create space when people aren't moving. I know stones made a bit if space on about 2 occasions, while every other player stood and watched.

We knew what we're up against, it's up to us to break them down, even trying to overload one side of the defence, or concentrate on picking up the second balls. It was an awful performance in my eyes and a total 180 from 2nd half at city.

We simply cannot afford to be dropping more pints like this
 

Mate. A G36 is the standard armament of the German and Spanish armies.

I know that, I misread your post, I thought you said G6. I think a relegation battle would require an ak47. Strong, hard, unbreakable it can get dirty and work. A weapon we can rely on.
 
I know that, I misread your post, I thought you said G6. I think a relegation battle would require an ak47. Strong, hard, unbreakable it can get dirty and work. A weapon we can rely on.

People overstate this. Its accuracy deminishes and it becomes prone to jamming if dirty.

To have/be a seemingsly flawless weapon you've got to clean it regularly.

Abit like our team. We're missing wingers. Proper wingers who are available.

Its like having a faulty ejector. We're getting stoppages and its affecting our effectiveness
 
People overstate this. Its accuracy deminishes and it becomes prone to jamming if dirty.

To have/be a seemingsly flawless weapon you've got to clean it regularly.

Abit like our team. We're missing wingers. Proper wingers who are available.

Its like having a faulty ejector. We're getting stoppages and its affecting our effectiveness
LOL.

It is still one of the most reliable weapons out there, and compared to nearly every other weapon - the AK can still fire under water, covered with mud, sand and pretty much anything out there. It very rarely jams, which has won quite a few battles on the fields, and it's also designed to be used under extreme conditions by the Russians, which they did very well.

Because of the simple design and very few moving parts it is also very cheap and extremely easy to maintain (and make), you just need to be shown probably once or twice and even you'd be able to take it apart.

There's probably people on here who have used it, so they can comment more on that, but not in this thread.

Either way this comment was very irrelevant to the discussion,carry on.
 

LOL.

It is still one of the most reliable weapons out there, and compared to nearly every other weapon - the AK can still fire under water, covered with mud, sand and pretty much anything out there. It very rarely jams, which has won quite a few battles on the fields, and it's also designed to be used under extreme conditions by the Russians, which they did very well.

Because of the simple design and very few moving parts it is also very cheap and extremely easy to maintain (and make), you just need to be shown probably once or twice and even you'd be able to take it apart.

There's probably people on here who have used it, so they can comment more on that, but not in this thread.

Either way this comment was very irrelevant to the discussion,carry on.

It jams regularly if not maintained well. You don't know jack.

Including about Everton's problems.
 
Hahaha is Damo still up? Loves it he does.

Some people get up in the middle of the night come on GOT post some nonsense looking dead clever; then go back to bed feeling like they achieved something.

Educating the masses and the indigent.

Its the done thing.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top