I did in another post as it happensWell yeah you can say this bit again.

Twice is enough
I did in another post as it happensWell yeah you can say this bit again.
I would hope she would support us if here husband plays for us, so we probably have gained a fan.I can assure you we haven’t gained one singular extra fan as a result of DCL being with some no mark Q list influencer.
Whose Sandy ?
I heard she has got a Stockport County season ticketI would hope she would support us if here husband plays for us, so we probably have gained a fan.
Apparently he was going to lie on his bed for a cry but missed from two yards out and that's how he ended up on the floor.'Crying on the floor on his birthday'
Very good, massively underrated in fact mainly due to that baggageBeckham was good at football though.
He talked about the noise from the stands, the fans rushing on the pitch at the end, the relief for everyone connected with the club and never having felt euphoria like it before or since.If you take aside the ridiculous platform he decides to go on of 'High Performance Podcast' there are some interesting points to take from it.
Not one mention of being suicidal, if anything he made a mistake in the past with wording comments to throw in that narrative
'Crying on the floor on his birthday', you just know the second he said this Humphrey's eyes lit up ready for the sound bite and comments to advertise his podcast, Dom mentions it quickly then carry's on.....but is pushed back to this comment to try and 'analyze it' and 'open up'
Dom talks about Seamus being a great leader and inspirational, with the asking about 'cultural architect. "The biggest cultural architect at Everton is Seamus Coleman,"
I very much doubt Seamus himself would like to use those words at all. Dressing rooms are full of different personality's and from Dom's comments Seamus is all about example and how you carry yourself, not talking about how to be or how hard you work.....but just doing it.
This is were i think the Dom/fans thing has fallen short, Dom ahs had some brilliant moments with us, Palace, Liverpool etc. But talking about the Palace game, he not once mentions the fans, he talks about how hard he has worked and the struggles building up, and the courage he shown to get us through that moment etc etc. Not once does he mention the fans dragging the players through.......in a nutshell its about him. Seamus is the oppsoite, its never about him.
That's not a criticism of Dom, but more a criticism of people that critise him and have the right too. As Duncan Ferguson has said 'There are better players to have played fro Everton than me, but they just never got it'.
Seamus got it, Duncan got it....even people like Ashley Young got it. I don't think Dom ever did, its abit like being Batman, you cant do it for the adulation, because the minute you seek it, its not coming.
That's not what i got from it, it sounded very 'look what i have done for you'.He talked about the noise from the stands, the fans rushing on the pitch at the end, the relief for everyone connected with the club and never having felt euphoria like it before or since.
By that rationale you only talk to your partner about things related to her work and background then?
You seriously think he isn't discussing his contract with the mother of his young child when the result of it could affect not only their future income but also which country they might end up living in? Give me a break
So you're a liar then. Duly noted."I'd always confer with my partner with 100% honesty" - 'you only talk to your partner about things related to her work and background then?' no, I'd not be 100% honest about what's going on, this is true almost at all times wrt personal negotiations because of subjectivity over objectivity.
"keep her up to speed with every development when her background is putting clothes on for a living." - 'you only talk to your partner about things related to her work and background then?' That's a completely incorrect take on that sentence - however, she just wouldn't be getting regular updates.
Do you think that if Everton pulled his contract, the first person his agent calls is DCL? And do you think that if that's true, DCL calls is his Mrs before anything else subsequently? And then further to that, you think that it's wise during ongoing contract negotiations for his Mrs to publicly refute an assertion made by a journalist? If the answer to these is yes, then we intrinsically look at this from different viewpoints where we're just never finding common ground on this.
About his contract situation and potential moves she is far more informed than Paul Joyce, simply because it affects her life as much as his particularly as his job would involve moving house and possibly country so yea we probably won't find common ground on this."I'd always confer with my partner with 100% honesty" - 'you only talk to your partner about things related to her work and background then?' no, I'd not be 100% honest about what's going on, this is true almost at all times wrt personal negotiations because of subjectivity over objectivity.
"keep her up to speed with every development when her background is putting clothes on for a living." - 'you only talk to your partner about things related to her work and background then?' That's a completely incorrect take on that sentence - however, she just wouldn't be getting regular updates.
Do you think that if Everton pulled his contract, the first person his agent calls is DCL? And do you think that if that's true, DCL calls is his Mrs before anything else subsequently? And then further to that, you think that it's wise during ongoing contract negotiations for his Mrs to publicly refute an assertion made by a journalist? If the answer to these is yes, then we intrinsically look at this from different viewpoints where we're just never finding common ground on this.
She didn't call him a liar though, she just said that what he's reporting isn't true. Honestly, the people getting worked about her are showing a pretty troubling attitude.
subjectivity vs objectivity - we're all liars from time to time, truth is irrefutable fact. perspective on truth involves objectivity which can deviate from irrefutable fact.So you're a liar then. Duly noted.
I'm neither name calling nor making my own metric, it was a fairly simple joke based on your incorrect definition of a lie.subjectivity vs objectivity - we're all liars (by your metric) from time to time, truth is irrefutable fact. perspective on truth involves objectivity which can deviate from irrefutable fact.
I'm just honest.