Hill Dickinson Stadium
- Thread starter Bilo
- Start date
- Status
I’ll keep calling it Bramley Moore regardless of what it’s called, so if someone is happy to put money into the club for media coverage then good on ‘em.
Blues will never, ever be happy.
Blues will never, ever be happy.
Onwards Evertonians
Player Valuation: £8m
I know, fancy giving out scarves in this weather.
Everton1878sk
Player Valuation: £225k
I don't know what could go more against the ethos of the city of Liverpool than the unethical actions of this company:
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
bylinetimes.com
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Major Law Firm Faces Court Over Withheld Contracts in Landmark NHS Whistleblowing Case
A judge has ordered full disclosure in a case which deprived 50,000 NHS doctors of legal whistleblowing protection
bylinetimes.com
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
I don't know what could go more against the ethos of the city of Liverpool than the unethical actions of this company:
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Major Law Firm Faces Court Over Withheld Contracts in Landmark NHS Whistleblowing Case
A judge has ordered full disclosure in a case which deprived 50,000 NHS doctors of legal whistleblowing protection
FFS.
Aha! The old guilty until proven innocent approach, Your Honour.I don't know what could go more against the ethos of the city of Liverpool than the unethical actions of this company:
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Major Law Firm Faces Court Over Withheld Contracts in Landmark NHS Whistleblowing Case
A judge has ordered full disclosure in a case which deprived 50,000 NHS doctors of legal whistleblowing protection
A publication that admits to being controversial and if you read to the end they were cleared by the SRA with ‘no case to answer’. Why bother looking so hard for muck?I don't know what could go more against the ethos of the city of Liverpool than the unethical actions of this company:
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Major Law Firm Faces Court Over Withheld Contracts in Landmark NHS Whistleblowing Case
A judge has ordered full disclosure in a case which deprived 50,000 NHS doctors of legal whistleblowing protection
They're investigative journalists. It's literally their job.
Houghty19
Player Valuation: £20m
I assume we've sold the rights to the highest bidder if so it's what we should expect. We can't moan one minute that we're not doing enough commercially then moan when we take the most cash on offer for the stadium rights, its just a shame it's such a stupid name for a stadium of our quality.
No I meant why go looking for the piece? The writers of the piece are making a story out of comments made in litigation - they were cleared when it was investigated by the SRA.
Last edited:
Mad how a name can be so underwhelming for something as outstanding as the new stadium.
West Side Charlie
Player Valuation: £5m
Welcome mate, you joined in 2007 and this is your first post, all so negative and not an ounce of truth in it anyway.I don't know what could go more against the ethos of the city of Liverpool than the unethical actions of this company:
Alaw firm that routinely advises health service bosses faces claims it withheld evidence in a landmark NHS whistleblowing case.
A judge has called for full evidence disclosure to assess claims that healthcare specialist firm Hill Dickinson acted fraudulently in a dispute over a lack of legal protection for NHS doctors in whistleblowing claims.
The firm will now have to account for its actions in litigation that saw more than 50,000 doctors below consultant level in England deprived of legal whistleblowing protections, according to the junior medic at the centre of it, Chris Day (37). The case also had implications for 865,000 agency workers across other sectors – including construction.
Had contracts drafted by the firm been revealed earlier in the litigation, MPs have also argued, it may have saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Major Law Firm Faces Court Over Withheld Contracts in Landmark NHS Whistleblowing Case
A judge has ordered full disclosure in a case which deprived 50,000 NHS doctors of legal whistleblowing protection
I wonder why you decide to post now.
We have never shamed this City
The same people defending this deal will be the same people who defended the club when it done the 10 year deal with Kitbag. Supported the Kirkby Tescodome and thought the leasing of Finch Farm was a massive success.
Quite clear now that the recent decisions of resigning Young, Coleman and stopping the Goodison legacy project are just cost saving measures to keep the books looking rosy so they can flip us.
Quite clear now that the recent decisions of resigning Young, Coleman and stopping the Goodison legacy project are just cost saving measures to keep the books looking rosy so they can flip us.
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
