Drico
Player Valuation: £70m
Paul Power was a tremendous player.Never mind or Van Den Hauwe, I'd rather have Paul Power or Bailey than Baines.
Winners.

Paul Power was a tremendous player.Never mind or Van Den Hauwe, I'd rather have Paul Power or Bailey than Baines.
Winners.
Of course you would DaveNever mind or Van Den Hauwe, I'd rather have Paul Power or Bailey than Baines.
Winners.
I had a chat with him last Saturday outside St Luke’s.Paul Power was a tremendous player.
But in the original statement you mentioned "current advancements", so if we hadn't gotten those and the mindset was still "kick lumps out of everyone" then Messi and Ronaldos and all that would be prepared for that and thrive again on talent alone, so they would likely be as successful.Of course the great players of today would be great in the past. But they wouldn't be as cleanly successful as they are today - simply because they would be kicked from pillar to post. But they would adapt. They would likely spend a sizeable amount of their careers on the treatment table and they would be man-marked in most games, as was the custom of the time (under the old rules). But we'd still see the flashes of brilliance and a Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo in the 80s would, no doubt, invent new ways to make an impact.
Talent is talent.
The old days weren't always the best - and the current years suffer from recency bias. But you'll always know a great player when you see one, whatever the era.
It's just funny that nowadays every young player is labeled like this. There's literal video evidence of everyone's idols being primadonnas in their own time too and doing the literal same tricks players nowadays use, as well as the same equivalents for the current generational best, but "back then those were dead 'ard" 
Think people that didn't see him think he was a bit like vinnie jones or something , yes he had an edge to his game, but he could play the game ,….that’s the point, he wasn’t a dirty player because he didn’t have to be. Terrific athlete, I don’t remember him regularly having to go to ground to dispossess an opponent. He was clearly a bit nuts, slept with his eyes open etc, but as far as football goes he wasn’t a liability.
Think people that didn't see him think he was a bit like vinnie jones or something , yes he had an edge to his game, but he could play the game ,
VERY Good a player, made the game look easy, fast good positioning ect, loved watching him.
PEJIC was another I thought was good as well.
Really was but could remember his legs went it was like he was running in mud every gamePaul Power was a tremendous player.
We only got him at the end. He is still lauded as a City legend, so that tells you the kind of player he was at his peak. I remember him as the City captain in the 1981 FA Cup final. At that point of his career, he was very highly regarded.Really was but could remember his legs went it was like he was running in mud every game
Baines right now tho ... yeah, he'd improve us no end .Watched them both lots of times ...
What I would say is Baines would have weakened the PVH team... and PVH would have weakened the Baines team.
The difference in the game over just 20yrs.
....think I'll just fence sit![]()
Disagree mate, but respectfully so.Will be an unpopular opinion but none of the back four of Everton were that silky. Including Van den Hauwe. He was possibly the best footballer in the defence. As a unit they all clicked for a few years under a manager who had them believing they were winners. Ratcliffes pace often got him out of trouble to account for his lack of technique. Degsy was a bruiser and frustrated centre forward. Gary Stevens was a fantastic athlete. Individually you wouldnt have said any of them were brilliant. As a collective. Kendall made them.
Helped aswell when you had the best keeper in the world behind them.