Well yeah, but that's a bit of a reach isn't it? I would say it was sacking him that was the issue because I have no idea how they could have come to the conclusion that 16th was an unacceptable position for a newly promoted team to be in 25% of the way through the season, but as with any manager who ends up losing their job, I suppose you could go all the way back to them being appointed and say it can't have been a good appointment in the first place because otherwise they wouldn't have ended up getting sacked.
I actually think they should have kept Cooper, but the argument against his wasn't really on results, but on performances. Like if you look at their Xg they were quite lucky to have the points they did.
I sort of think getting rid of him was a reasonable call, but going to RVN was an awful decision, indicative of a lot of muddled thinking by teams. In fairness we did similar with Lampard.
I have to say as well,.there seems to be a real arrogance at teams who get promoted. I remember reading press out of Burnley prior to last season from close to the club saying things like the very minimum expectation would be that they would not be in a relegation dogfight. Like as a worst case scenario they would have 45 points or whatever. You see similar with Leeds now.
How I'm all for some positivity but it has to be at least tinged with a bit of realism. Anyway I think Leicester felt a bit like that with Cooper. That they would otherwise be 10th with any other manager, rather than yours basically hoping for a miracle to stay up.