Psr another season not squad ratio

[mikel_88]

 

[Blue Willy]

We will go from being the worst financially run club to one of the best. After the past few years, most other clubs will have a bit of worry and catching up to do on us now.

 

[mikel_88]

We will go from being the worst financially run club to one of the best. After the past few years, most other clubs will have a bit of worry and catching up to do on us now.

Yeah wasnt sure if this would give us less to spend but well either way want us buy smart not just throw money around agaij

 

[Nymzee]

We (fans) don’t know enough to say if this is a good or bad thing. We don’t know how much we can spend with PSR, nor how much we could have spent with SCR.

The fact they have to keep it for another year because of fannying about is the best part.

 

[Blue83]

Have to presume it's a good thing if the clubs have voted for it

 

[GrandOldTeam]

Have to presume it's a good thing if the clubs have voted for it

Feels like most of the league are turkeys voting for Christmas.

Things like extra subs, and 5 subs etc. Benefits the top teams more than most.

 

[mikel_88]

We (fans) don’t know enough to say if this is good or bad thing. We don’t know how much we can spend with PSR, nor how much we could have spent with SCR.

The fact they have to keep it for another year because of fannying about is the best part.

Guess new deals will be in this like the new shirt one maybe stadium naming but yeah not even surprised by it. Much like chelsea leicester getting around the rules whole thing is so badly run

 

[pfim]

In general, I think the current system encourages more spending than the % of revenue that were bandied about.

 

[ArtetaMoney]

We need the someone in the know like Esk to give us an overview of what this means for us in the summer.

 

[Jacko93]

Have to presume it's a good thing if the clubs have voted for it

Would be interesting to know who voted un favour. Was it unanimous, or did Chelsea/ United etc vote against. Would be quite telling if so.

 

[PeregrineT]

I suspect this ALSO means that its still optional to base it on 85% of your revenue. This season was supposed to be the transition year where you could either choose PSR, or 85% of revenue, next year mandating the 85%.

So then it shouldnt have any impact on us next season unless we get even more room using the PSR method. I assume the reason this was pushed back is too many teams felt they couldnt fit under the 85% yet? Seems a little strange.

 

[trueblue84]

West ham joining the psr party.

 

[Hackbread]

Feels like most of the league are turkeys voting for Christmas.

Things like extra subs, and 5 subs etc. Benefits the top teams more than most.

Im still baffled how teams with smaller budgets were keen for the change to subs rules.
When you look at our bench over some recent seasons with two goalkeepers on it while the likes of city can field 5 fresh players who would walk into the line up of most premier leauge clubs. Its a huge advantage that plays into the richer clubs

 

[Milk]

As an addendum to this, Times reporting that PL are insisting that they have the right to access club mobile phones and computers and the right to enter club premises without much notice

Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules to remain next season

Several clubs, including Manchester United, Newcastle United and Aston Villa, have all criticised PSR.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Bob Latchford]

Is it still possible to offset player spend on business and operating income etc?

I’ve never really looked and the differences or implications of PSR and FFP…. I know they relate to not making in excess of £105m in losses and breaking even over 3 years respectively but im unsure of the intricacies.