pfim
Player Valuation: £50m
Right, so you would walk out of 2m a year because your boss made you do a couple things, and probably said "you'll get to chose the next one, this decision is mine".
I dont think so.
This.
Right, so you would walk out of 2m a year because your boss made you do a couple things, and probably said "you'll get to chose the next one, this decision is mine".
I dont think so.
If you have already made a wedge from football and can probably pick up a wage elsewhere, while at the same time these kind of things are damaging your reputation just like Brands has done, then yes.Right, so you would walk out of 2m a year because your boss made you do a couple things, and probably said "you'll get to chose the next one, this decision is mine".
I dont think so.
But that's never happened here over the course of 3 DoF's, its just been an utter pigs ear of a bit of this and a bit of that. Also when you are lining up someone like Guirassy and you end up with Maupay, the majority of DoF's (I would imagine) are going to be pretty fuming with those above. It's just amazing how its a role that seems to work everywhere else except here and people wonder why, maybe just let that person do their actual job.Right, so you would walk out of 2m a year because your boss made you do a couple things, and probably said "you'll get to chose the next one, this decision is mine".
I dont think so.
By the same logic, players who aren't getting a game should agree to rip up their contracts and any wages they're entitled to, so they can go and sign elsewhereIf you have already made a wedge from football and can probably pick up a wage elsewhere, while at the same time these kind of things are damaging your reputation just like Brands has done, then yes.
Near enough £5m back just from Marseille before add onsWere did you get that from?
Maybe half a million, but don't see how you have got that we have received £7m in loan fee's for Maupay
From memory wasnt the discussion him voicing his displeasure at how he wasnt able to do his job?Brands didn’t resign because of interference I think. He resigned directly after having a row with a fan at Goodison if I remember well
But that's never happened here over the course of 3 DoF's, its just been an utter pigs ear of a bit of this and a bit of that. Also when you are lining up someone like Guirassy and you end up with Maupay, the majority of DoF's (I would imagine) are going to be pretty fuming with those above. It's just amazing how its a role that seems to work everywhere else except here and people wonder why, maybe just let that person do their actual job.
If he signed the next Messi it would probably be three games too late into a season that has already started.We get it, you hate Thelwell. No need to tell it again and again. Even if he signed the next Messi you would still complain that he is doing a bad job.
A scar on his forehead and a female sidekick that does the actual work?But theres not a single shred of any doubt that KT has been our "best" DoF.
Walsh, wasnt allowed to do his job, vast, vast sums of money was wasted on his watch
Brands, wasnt allowed to do his job, vast, vast sums of money was wasted on his watch
And then KT, who has basically had to go on his hands and knees to give Moyes the tools to be Harry Potter.
Hes a wizard Esgy.A scar on his forehead and a female sidekick that does the actual work?
Since when can he pick up 2m a year elsewhere? This isnt Don Carlo coming in with a CV who can demand his way, he was working at NYRB. Its beyond absurd to say if a guy gets to choose 3 of the 4 signings on a job he was ALREADY sold as a really difficult one, hes going to cut and leave because things happen exactly as he was told when he signed up for it.If you have already made a wedge from football and can probably pick up a wage elsewhere, while at the same time these kind of things are damaging your reputation just like Brands has done, then yes.
Almost seems to be proof then you are irrational about it. Most see a pattern of everyone behaving the same way and think "that must be the rational way to act", you see it and have a fit over it. You find examples of DOFs who have left their position because they got overruled on one 10m signing and you can have a point. You wont though, will you?But that's never happened here over the course of 3 DoF's, its just been an utter pigs ear of a bit of this and a bit of that. Also when you are lining up someone like Guirassy and you end up with Maupay, the majority of DoF's (I would imagine) are going to be pretty fuming with those above. It's just amazing how its a role that seems to work everywhere else except here and people wonder why, maybe just let that person do their actual job.
Since when can he pick up 2m a year elsewhere? This isnt Don Carlo coming in with a CV who can demand his way, he was working at NYRB. Its beyond absurd to say if a guy gets to choose 3 of the 4 signings on a job he was ALREADY sold as a really difficult one, hes going to cut and leave because things happen exactly as he was told when he signed up for it.