New Everton Owners: The Friedkin Group

What do we reckon?

  • 👍

    Votes: 961 70.0%
  • 🤷 | 🧀🥪

    Votes: 326 23.8%
  • 👎

    Votes: 85 6.2%

  • Total voters
    1,372


Is it better to have a bad striker or no striker at all..............

We signed him 29th Aug.

Window shut I think 2 or 3 days later.

We had to sell that window first/make a profit and defer spend to later.

The season had started.

We were bottom of the league after 3 games, having not scored a goal.

Eventually we sign a player who was available for literally £0 upfront. There's not many of them.

We paid a premium for him, but we would never have signed him if hands weren't tied. If he was a priority he'd have been in earlier.

We have to accept the reality of significant migitating circumstances with Everton the last 3-4 years, caused by ownership.
 
We signed him 29th Aug.

Window shut I think 2 or 3 days later.

We had to sell that window first/make a profit and defer spend to later.

The season had started.

We were bottom of the league after 3 games, having not scored a goal.

Eventually we sign a player who was available for literally £0 upfront. There's not many of them.

We paid a premium for him, but we would never have signed him if hands weren't tied. If he was a priority he'd have been in earlier.

We have to accept the reality of significant migitating circumstances with Everton the last 3-4 years, caused by ownership.

100%, i imagine all our signings from Carlo forwards were done on the basis of players we could afford and deals we could do - rather then players we optimally wanted to sign.
 
Last edited:
Disagree.

The difference then was very likely Calvert-Lewin or no one. Or Calvert-Lewin or Beto.

When we consider Calvert-Lewin's fitness at the time, we absolutely needed another striker.

This isn't like when we signed Tosun.

Makes the difference when such small margins at the bottom.

…no DCL and Gordon playing central striker, we needed a striker more when he bought Maupay 6 games into the season.
 
Last edited:

…we needed a striker more when he bought Maupay 6 games into the season. Of course not all transfers work out but I stand by my view that there’s no excuse for buying poor footballers.
I think the scatter brained approach to a striker is what ultimately proves he shouldn’t be doing this job.

Everton currently play long ball football to a target man and have basically since Moyes left (despite any pretence that Silva/Lampard actually tried to play football). Yet in his time here he has purchased back ups to DCL who don’t even remotely fit this style of football and are thus utterly useless even if they would be better in teams that played on the floor.
 
I think the scatter brained approach to a striker is what ultimately proves he shouldn’t be doing this job.

Everton currently play long ball football to a target man and have basically since Moyes left (despite any pretence that Silva/Lampard actually tried to play football). Yet in his time here he has purchased back ups to DCL who don’t even remotely fit this style of football and are thus utterly useless even if they would be better in teams that played on the floor.

…..that Maupay signing said a lot to me, given DCL was injured and we had no central striker for 6 or more games into the season. Crazy situation leaving us so exposed at the start of a season and then bringing in a player totally unsuited to our requirements.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top