There wont be any firing until the take over that's for sure mate - neither side will want to eat the cost, i know it goes on the clubs books - but from a cashflow point of view its coming of someone bottom line and in the vacuum neither is going to want to eat it.
In truth no one including myself, can talk on authority, trend or even educated guess on what the TFG might do. We're simply feeling our way in the dark. I think its actually a difficult situation for TFG to be in as they walk immediately into a difficult decision and have to manage risk- be interesting to see how they manage it and what they do. Id personally be surprised if they sack him, the least line of resistance is to add players and improve outcomes. But i really dont know.
In terms of authority, its only the board on the advice of the shareholders who can make the decision. In reality in our position, TFG will be prompting that or assenting to it - they influenced the vote with PL last week, so already are having an influence on decision making. So in theory, either the new or old shareholder can prompt it - but i doubt either will - because one or the other will have to eat the cost and there isn't the time to work that out.
For example TFG say, Farhad sack Dyche, Moshiri says, yeah ok - but what happens if the takeover falls through - will you commit 5 -10 mill to the balance sheet to cover it - TFG says no - so Moshiri says no as he wont eat the cost and nothing changes - the take over will happen quicker.