There seems to be much uncertainty and the PL not providing clarity which is unacceptable. The reports vary, but not having to engage in a firesale seems encouraging.
If we are not compliant, perhaps it's by a small margin but the concern there is precedent has now been set and another breach would be considered aggravating and result in a certain points deduction.
I think the bigger deadline for us is Friedkins completion of their due diligence. I read that once this is completed they can begin to have an impact on decision making, ahead of the OADT. If this is the case, then you would think that dealing with PSR hangover would be item one of their priorities. We have to know where we stand.
A large part of the problem since the initial charge is having discredited and absentee management, with continuous uncertainty and now a bare-minimum and acting board.
We need adults in the room to represent us and sort this out once and for all. If that doesn't work then I imagine they have good lawyers in Texas. Surely it's in the PL interest as well as our own to get our relationship with them on some sort of even keel, even if they have very obviously exploited our situation and used us as their scapegoat.