Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This is the thing, the prem have already accepted that the current system is a mess and not fit for purpose… so it’s absolutely ridiculous that they’re continuing with this flawed process. Just bloody scrap it all now, and restart once a proper system has been worked out and put in place.The Premier league are making it up as they go along.
That's why we have been up in arms.
We have been working with them for two seasons having to sign off deals and not completing others at there behest , got us nowhere.
No use saying its a figure over a certain threshold gets you a 2 piont deduction as nobody knows the formula used or indeed if there is even one?
It's just at the whim of 3 people at the hearing.
It's that good they are scrapping it.
But you and us and I suspect a few more we get hit.
What happens if we both get deductions this season.
Other teams do something similar for next season they get away scot free?
Maybe not if goes up i want it over i just want us get a fair case then move onDon't give a monkeys just as long we've made it difficult for them like the last minute appeal class
Why not if can get lower why cant it go higher by a point?Nobody seriously thinks Forest will have their punishment increased for appealing
Why use the word 'even'? It doesn't mean the same as 'including'.Errr no club should be deducted points even evverton The whole thing is corrupt open your eyes
Not happeningNobody seriously thinks Forest will have their punishment increased for appealing
They also said the decision on our first appeal would be announced mid feb which it wasn't. I would take any date announces from them with a pinch of salt, unless cited as information from the league or that Tony Campari fella.Sky Sports News said this morning we should know by the 8th of April
Yep sorry anyWhy use the word 'even'? It doesn't mean the same as 'including'.
Said it before but if we'd have refused to sell Richy before the 30th June accounts deadline, and instead kept him for a few months and played him for 90 mins in a game in which we took 3 points from a relegation rival, there'd have been uproar.Any forest fan bringing up the Johnson point deserves to be laughed at.
I don't think so, if they can prove that they got more by holding on then isn't that better as far as sustainability goes? Or do the PL want teams to sell for less by a certain date, if this is the case then the rules are even more of a joke than I could have ever imagined.Any forest fan bringing up the Johnson point deserves to be laughed at.
CorrectI don't think so, if they can prove that they got more by holding on then isn't that better as far as sustainability goes? Or do the PL want teams to sell for less by a certain date, if this is the case then the rules are even more of a joke than I could have ever imagined.
I'm glad that you're not. I like you the way you are.wish we was a normal run club
Said it before but if we'd have refused to sell Richy before the 30th June accounts deadline, and instead kept him for a few months and played him for 90 mins in a game in which we took 3 points from a relegation rival, there'd have been uproar.
Forest somehow think this is a mitigating circumstance.