I dont see how this is the case
The severity of a punishment is often reduced on appeal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The severity of a punishment is often reduced on appeal
They didn't use that calculation.
JLW
Player Valuation: £60m
I do, i think we get 4 points back and 6 remain for the admitted breach.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
Yeah I assume the appeal board can do what they like and all options are open.
If there was some weird all or nothing rule it would have to be in the PL hand book and I’m sure it would be known by now.
Do you have a source for this?
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
It wouldn’t really be a massive admission of failure or be seen as one to reduce the sanction. A reduction in the sanction would be part of the normal ebb and flow of these things. The sanction on Wednesday was halved on appeal.
An adjustment to the sanction wouldn’t necessarily blast a hole in the PLs case or the ICs decision, it could just bring into line with existing known precedents like that case.
TGW89
Player Valuation: £35m
Bit like the 10th August minutes....
Lloydaldo11
Player Valuation: £1.5m
All or nothing is the only acceptable route for this. You can’t say it’s ok for us and forest to have the same penalty (6) as we don’t know how far over they are plus there’s no framework for a sanction in the first place.
It should be all points back and until they sort out this disaster P&S/FFP or whatever joke of a “rule” they are running then there should be no penalty at all.
I see another “football finance expert” is in the i today claiming we were £25m over and our sporting advantage was James and Carlo during that period. Wheeling any old misinformed idiot out in the press now to defend the indefensible.
People are arguing “but you admitted it”… did we? Or were we neive enough to be transparent with a joke shop of an organisation in panic mode desperate to get the government off its back?
I should hope that when it all comes out, silk has pushed for a completely clean slate, no points deduction, no fine, no transfer ban. Nothing but the best for Everton Football Club.
It’s long overdue we grew a backbone
It should be all points back and until they sort out this disaster P&S/FFP or whatever joke of a “rule” they are running then there should be no penalty at all.
I see another “football finance expert” is in the i today claiming we were £25m over and our sporting advantage was James and Carlo during that period. Wheeling any old misinformed idiot out in the press now to defend the indefensible.
People are arguing “but you admitted it”… did we? Or were we neive enough to be transparent with a joke shop of an organisation in panic mode desperate to get the government off its back?
I should hope that when it all comes out, silk has pushed for a completely clean slate, no points deduction, no fine, no transfer ban. Nothing but the best for Everton Football Club.
It’s long overdue we grew a backbone
This will be the only penalty we get this season.
Victus
Player Valuation: £35m
In theory yes. It just depends if the mitigation taking into account is for the years not dropping off the psr calculations and whether that's enough to drop us under whatever limit we have exceeded.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
Yes. The appeal could amend our PSR figure for 21/22 and that could pull down our figure for the three years to 22/23.
For example: if they accept a 10m reduction for 21/22 to compensate for the Player X situation that would pull down our overspend for the first charge to 9.5m. So we’d still be guilty but the sanction would likely reduce. BUT that 10m reduction also pulls through to the period of the second charge which if we are currently less than 10m over would then make the charge go away.