Lloydaldo11
Player Valuation: £1m
Around 1 minute of this - he referred to "the small clubs"
A buffoon on so many levels
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Around 1 minute of this - he referred to "the small clubs"
Not sure VAR works anywhere.Var works in other places and in FIFA and UEFA competitions. It doesn’t in the PL and we all know why. It doesn’t really support your argument because there is one common factor in all of this - the PL.
The whole thing is a joke and unless you were on the right side of it when it was brought in and considered one of Master’s big clubs, like yours, then you won’t experience anything like what the other 14+ deal with.
Thing is they probably should accept it as a mitigation. The rules are about profit and sustainability and meant to prevent mismanagement, well selling a player for 30m when you could get 45 a few weeks later is mismanagement.Wait and see, they;ll accept Forest’s defence that it made sense to postpone sale of Johnson to get more cash and allow them an add back of £30m.
despite telling us to do one saying we sold Richy on the cheap to have it in accounts!
They are at it again.Absolute state of these beauts. I'll be closing my account down and won't be using Paddy Power again.
View attachment 236735
Unfortunately, Matty you have left yourself open to a retort from Gwladys as your grammar and punctuation let you down.your a filthy dirty red
that was a sentence now leg it
We are banged to rights.
We have admitted that most of our PSR exclusions were false. The two we are clinging to are the Stadium interest and the transfer levy. The Premier League has documentation showing two things. That the terms of the loan state it was not for Stadium funding and secondly that Moshiri was providing interest-free loans for the Stadium.
The transfer levy is even more ludicrous. It primarily goes to top-up pension funds and is not for youth development.
You can pay for the best Barrister on the planet but it is pointless if he has no grounds to challenge the decision of the Independent panel.
Its because we cant even talk about the actual football on the pitch, both the club and the league trying to destryoy us fans.I'm rapidly getting to the stage where I simply can't be arsed about football in general and Everton particular.
Pathetic on my part but I seem consumed by our difficulties and could be time to take a step back and find something else to do with my time.
Don't all of the other leagues already pay much lower salaries? How would the get more going to Serie A or Bundesliga?The players would all go abroad and the league would collapse.
The fact the punishment was more severe than the punishment for going into administration, which the Profit and sustainability rules are meant to protect against means there's ample room to challenge the decision. Are you that much of an imbecile you can't grasp that?
I asked you earlier if you thought an overspend of roughly just one years of Salah's wages, is worthy of the harshest ever punishment handed out by the Premier League. You keep dodging these basic principle questions though and revert to waffling on about technical issues and claiming we have no grounds for appeal. Even in a criminal court, the guiltiest man alive can have grounds for appeal, so please stop talking rubbish, and please. please answer my question once and for all.
A buffoon on so many levels
Oh behave yourself, falling over kopites copy and paste postsI know this lad is currently in the process of a mass pile on, but not a single word he says here is wrong you know.
Haha we!We are banged to rights.
We have admitted that most of our PSR exclusions were false. The two we are clinging to are the Stadium interest and the transfer levy. The Premier League has documentation showing two things. That the terms of the loan state it was not for Stadium funding and secondly that Moshiri was providing interest-free loans for the Stadium.
The transfer levy is even more ludicrous. It primarily goes to top-up pension funds and is not for youth development.
You can pay for the best Barrister on the planet but it is pointless if he has no grounds to challenge the decision of the Independent panel.
I noticed nobody has discussed the points he raised and merely just called him a kopite.Oh behave yourself, falling over kopites copy and paste posts
I know this lad is currently in the process of a mass pile on, but not a single word he says here is wrong you know.