you will we be ok mate?
you will we be ok mate?
I agree - have we still got some auditors? If they sign off on our capitalising these interest charges then it should be fairly straightforward- that’s if esk is correct and that this is what is tipping us into non-compliance.
Lloydaldo11
Player Valuation: £1m
A) see Reading
B & C) the whole lot are a gang of charlatans running a protectionist cartel for the behest of their six cash cows and their customers. The other 14 clubs and their fans are non-entities viewed to make up the numbers. Journos are also complicit, look how many media stooges are either connected with the Sky six and the media is heavily used as a PR machine for those clubs. Remember the “poor sonny” nonsense for example after he did Gomes? The farce that is ref watch? All designed to maintain the brand and the fix. Any journo going against the grain will find themselves out of work and shunned in this country. Media outlets sell and need the constant publicity they get from their customers. Sky peddling on transfer center about us interested in Phillips mere minutes after getting a FFP charge… why? It’s all about clickbait revenue and why very few outside of twitter will go against the grain.
it may be flexible accounting, if the end aim of the loan was for the stadium but we utilised it in the mean time for cash flow, it couldn't be done this way if it was solely for the stadium but it eventually was used for the stadium. A moot technical point.
neil999
Player Valuation: £80m
Transfer ban would be a logical punishment imo
Koff gramps
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
I don't really know.
Think the league have put a target on our back now that we can't shake. They could be lenient but haven't as they've got alterior motives.
Then we've got an not ideal takeover that may not happen who will inherit this mess (as it won't go away unless we sell assets ie players).
Then there's a stadium which last time we heard was secured and ready to be finished.
If we stay in the league another season...it's a huge win.
Possibly, but even that doesn't feel quite right with me considering our losses are mainly due to stadium costs.
Certainly a far more appropriate punishment than 10 points though
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
Forest won't get 10 points for being (from what Ive read which is still not official) £12.5mill over based purely on buying 28 players in a season.
ashwuk76
Player Valuation: £30m
actually thats taking into account the time they spent in the championship, the statement sets out how they calculate it.. its why its £61mill over the 3 year period, they reduce it £22mill per year in the championship over the period..
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £35m
Koff yourself with your puerile attempt at sarcasm. You're dead clever, eh, with your open secret...
canuckblue
Player Valuation: £50m
Everton don't get pens, mate.
For me, the worst case scenario and most probable if our mitigation (stadium) is rejected on appeal, is 12 points for the 2 breaches with the first one reduced to 6.we aren’t getting them back
you said we won’t another deduction
then said we will
If stadium mitigation is accepted, I am thinking 6 to 8 points deduction with second breach cancelled as within psr limit (with stadium mitigation).
We need to try forget about it and focus on the games and I am sure dyche will do exactly that. Get the most points possible and then we'll see at the end of the season where we are.
