Our problem, or perhaps opportunity, with a can of worms being opened up is that it incentivises The PL to put a lid on further hearings and potential further hearings.
Not to mention claims and counter claims. It's just we were a very convenient option to make a statement with and an example of. A test case.
The club's statement on Friday was bang on in referencing this. Let's have proportionate punishment for all where warranted, and charges brought where necessary. If that doesn't occur, or is being put on the long-finger, then it's likely that by the time the appeal is heard, we'll still be the only club to have faced a hearing and receive a sanction.
I think we have a multitude of arguments to put forward, the severity of the sanction and failure to act in a coherent and transparent way against other offending clubs, being foremost amongst them.
I can't believe The PL wish this as the start of a period of continuous hearings and member clubs threatening legal action against each other. The logical end of that is it's eventual destruction.
If they wish to avoid that premise, and mark this as a line in the sand, then our punishment simply cannot stand as it is. It must either be drastically reduced or undone completely. Everton cannot be the scapegoat for a myriad of ills.