Mason Greenwood

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Nightman said:
So you felt the need to comment on something that don't know anything about, whilst criticizing others?

Not so much criticising ... just offering an air of caution since I read a lot of vitriol directed at somebody who, at the time, had not been subject of a successful prosecution. Like I said - I wasn't aware of the transcript evidence (not that it's been proved to be correct, no discredited in court) at the time.

It's what conversation is all about ... unless one want an echo chamber.

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Nymzee said:
^

Bold claim from someone that has no knowledge on the situation.

Was it a claim? See that thing at the end of the sentence? It was a query. I am always a bit alarmed when a bunch of people, who don't have access to all the facts and circumstances, start picking up torches and pitchforks!

Nymzee · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Was it a claim? See that thing at the end of the sentence? It was a query. I am always a bit alarmed when a bunch of people, who don't have access to all the facts and circumstances, start picking up torches and pitchforks!

This is very ironic.

Charro · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Seriously? Hard? I honestly have more interesting pursuits than trawling through celebrity gossip. Its not hard to distance yourself from the baying rabble .

Why comment in the thread then?

You’re not interested, you don’t have any of the facts, yet you comment in the thread

Just seems strange to me.

Lobster Johnson · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Sigh. If you've actually read the thread yourself, you'll see that I have, and I commented on it that he's clearly a bad one.

Made yourself look a bit dopey here pal.

Yes.

It is me who has been made to look dopey here.

Nightman · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Not so much criticising ... just offering an air of caution since I read a lot of vitriol directed at somebody who, at the time, had not been subject of a successful prosecution. Like I said - I wasn't aware of the transcript evidence (not that it's been proved to be correct, no discredited in court) at the time.

It's what conversation is all about ... unless one want an echo chamber.

Listen to the audio then - the transcript is entirely correct. And that is why he is getting dogs. It's not an echo chamber ffs

I think you gave the game away with your post earlier, when you talk about 'unfounded claims against wealthy men'. I expect that's your natural position on this subject...probably a viewpoint from an echo chamber of cantankerous old men.

Bruce Wayne · August 17, 2023

It was subtler to just hate on Women's Hour all the time. There was no need to jump the shark.

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Nymzee said:
This is very ironic.

Not really. I haven't read into the facts but also I wasn't condemning him. I was expressing surprise at how many condemn without really ever having heard the whole story.

If anyone in GOT was there witnessing these events - let's hear the testimonial.

Charro said:
Why comment in the thread then?

You’re not interested, you don’t have any of the facts, yet you comment in the thread

Just seems strange to me.

I was interested enough in the thread to comment. It's called conversation. Is thus such an alien concept to you?

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Lobster Johnson said:
Yes.

It is me who has been made to look dopey here.

It can happen to us all.

Nymzee · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Not really. I haven't read into the facts but also I wasn't condemning him. I was expressing surprise at how many condemn without really ever having heard the whole story.

If anyone in GOT was there witnessing these events - let's hear the testimonial.

But we have heard the whole story, and we've heard the evidence, hence we can condemn...

Lobster Johnson · August 17, 2023

As I wasn't on either of the planes that slammed into the World Trade Center, how can I be sure it really happened?

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Nightman said:
Listen to the audio then - the transcript is entirely correct. And that is why he is getting dogs. It's not an echo chamber ffs

I think you gave the game away with your post earlier, when you talk about 'unfounded claims against wealthy men'. I expect that's your natural position on this subject...probably a viewpoint from an echo chamber of cantankerous old men.

Oh behave. I'm was just reserving judgement until I knew more of the facts and my questionn8ng revealed the facts to me.

And the fact that there are people who make false malicious allegations, for money or fir attention, is also a fact. As a young teacher I was warned that teenage girls are particularly prone to this, by a number if female teachers. Obviously such observations would not be allowed to be stated today.

Lobster Johnson · August 17, 2023

chrismpw said:
Oh behave. I'm was just reserving judgement until I knew more of the facts and my questionn8ng revealed the facts to me.

And the fact that there are people who make false malicious allegations, for money or fir attention, is also a fact. As a young teacher I was warned that teenage girls are particularly prone to this, by a number if female teachers. Obviously such observations would not be allowed to be stated today.

You just stated it.

chrismpw · August 17, 2023

Nymzee said:
But we have heard the whole story, and we've heard the evidence, hence we can condemn...

Fair enough.

If you were there - rather than reading "he said she said they said" Internet evidence. Which is the only point I'm trying to make on this matter.