The 4-5-1,4-4-1-1 and 4-2-3-1 is transient. The best teams are fluid. The 4-2-3-1 most respresents the style of play we should be going for imo but it doesn't have to be restrictive.
There is a big difference.
We don't actually play 4-5-1, by the way. It's usually 4-4-1-1, as Cahill plays behind the striker.
The difference with a 4-2-3-1 is the personnel. If you have a fluid 3 then it gives you a cutting edge that we lack with a 4-4-1-1, as we're quite rigid and predictable.
That's kind of what I am saying. The personnel almost impose the formation by the way they play.
It doesn't matter what we'd pick, Moyes sticks to what he knows and will not change.
Exactly. And I think it works to be honest, assuming the players we've picked are right. Osman for example really needs to be the one behind the striker. He's devastating there but comparatively ineffective out wide.
Yeah well everyone can see anywhere in the middle is better than out wide for Osman!