VDM to play in Brann?

[TheDevils2001]

If we get another goal or two in the 2nd leg pretty quickly he might get a chance to play in the 2nd half.

 

[Sharpys top lip]

Goodnight shandy!! your finished here!!

 

[linglong]

Bloody hell Golum is alive and kicking (or trying to)

lol precioussssssssssssssssssssssss

 

[linglong]

I dont understand the animosity to Andy Van- people see him as a waster but why?! Hes had some problems and the boss hasnt picked him- is that his fault? I would much rather see a player despised because of his actions on the pitch rather than when its a loack of action on it.

Question: Is it his fault the gaffer doesnt pick him?! Moyes does not suffer fools gladly but he has kept hold of the Van- he could easily have terminated his contract if his actions were that bad.

The fact that he draws a large wage and has done nothing for us in the time he's been with us pretty much gets everyones back up.

If it where me or you and we played up like he does at work we'd be sacked..its as simple as that

 

[micknick]

The fact that he draws a large wage and has done nothing for us in the time he's been with us pretty much gets everyones back up.

If it where me or you and we played up like he does at work we'd be sacked..its as simple as that

What has he done? (apart from not get picked)

 

[TX Bill]

The fact that he draws a large wage and has done nothing for us in the time he's been with us pretty much gets everyones back up.

If it where me or you and we played up like he does at work we'd be sacked..its as simple as that

And yet it's responses like this one (and I've seen this one a lot Linglong so this isn't on you per se) that cause me to wonder.

Have you wondered then why HE hasn't gotten the sack? I mean if it's REALLY that bad, then why hasn't Moyes just cut him loose. Don't tell me "well we'd lose what we're paying him in wages."

Well we're losing that NOW. So what's the difference?

Micknick makes a logical point that he can help it if he isn't picked. Yet that point always seems to conveniently get overlooked.

Micknic

 

[monty]

And yet it's responses like this one (and I've seen this one a lot Linglong so this isn't on you per se) that cause me to wonder.

Have you wondered then why HE hasn't gotten the sack? I mean if it's REALLY that bad, then why hasn't Moyes just cut him loose. Don't tell me "well we'd lose what we're paying him in wages."

Well we're losing that NOW. So what's the difference?

Micknick makes a logical point that he can help it if he isn't picked. Yet that point always seems to conveniently get overlooked.

Micknic

Contract terms is a possiblity and yes it is something I have wondered about as well.

 

[TX Bill]

I can't imagine his contract says "can't be sacked."

Sure, we'd have to pay him but I'm sure most contracts have some sort of general behavior clause in it.

 

[monty]

I can't imagine his contract says "can't be sacked."

Sure, we'd have to pay him but I'm sure most contracts have some sort of general behavior clause in it.

I'm certain it can't be because of his footballing ability and some of the things that get into contracts who is to say. His track record at other clubs isn't brilliant, best being 86 appearances in four seasons at Ajax, he only appeared 31 times for Inter over two seasons, God knows what his turn out record is for us, I shudder to think

 

[SuitsBlue]

under 20 first team appearances in 3 years.

i suspect.

its really bad.

 

[Number_25]

I think thats it for VDM, Back to the Dutch leagues he goes...

 

[monty]

I think thats it for VDM, Back to the Dutch leagues he goes...

It is a fact that no one will take him on his present wages, he will see out his contract