Who's idea was that, anyway?
Bloody Jimmy Hill.
Bloody Jimmy Hill.
- Status
Good idea IMO.
Completely devalues being hard to beat, like we are at the minute, though. With two points for a win, we'd be title contenders.
It also prevents teams from playing 10 at the back.
It doesn't though. The game is much more defensive now then it was during the 30s and the 60s with the two points for a win system.
dholliday
deconstructed rep
Definitely better 3pts instead of 2.
But what about this crazy idea? -1 for a loss
Draws would then still be rewarding, wins even more so, and a loss would be extremely painful. It means beating a team would put 4 points between us and them...high stakes!
Tho' might be counter-intuitive, as most teams are ****-scared of that, and end up playing for draws...
But what about this crazy idea? -1 for a loss
Draws would then still be rewarding, wins even more so, and a loss would be extremely painful. It means beating a team would put 4 points between us and them...high stakes!
Tho' might be counter-intuitive, as most teams are ****-scared of that, and end up playing for draws...
I think if you have the word Pool in your name you should be docked 50 points at the start of every Season.
The fact is that since the three point win was introduced, international football has become much more negative and low scoring, while even domestic football has largely moved on from the goal gluts of the two point era.
There is no evidence at all to argue that the game is more attacking now.
There is no evidence at all to argue that the game is more attacking now.
manxtoffee
******
'Itch my chin' Jimmy.
Another good thing he did was campaign to abolish the maximum wage of twenty quid.
Another good thing he did was campaign to abolish the maximum wage of twenty quid.
dholliday
deconstructed rep
poor Hartlepool...
I sort of agree, but last season and this season seems to very goal-glutty...not sure why.
Whitebootman
Player Valuation: £35m
2 points for a win
Nothing for a draw
- 1 for a loss
Not sure it would improve anything, but it would p off fifa which can't be bad.
Nothing for a draw
- 1 for a loss
Not sure it would improve anything, but it would p off fifa which can't be bad.
Ehrlin
Player Valuation: £950k
Definitely better 3pts instead of 2.
But what about this crazy idea? -1 for a loss
Draws would then still be rewarding, wins even more so, and a loss would be extremely painful. It means beating a team would put 4 points between us and them...high stakes!
Tho' might be counter-intuitive, as most teams are ****-scared of that, and end up playing for draws...
Same as the old 2 for win and 1 for draw.
Same as we have now.
samcdavies94
Player Valuation: £8m
I don't want anything to change...I don't like change!
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
