in theory I agree for terminally ill people who still have capacity to make that choice but once you make it law it opens the floodgates for people like ian brady to argue that you are then denying him his lawful right to kill himself.
in theory I agree for terminally ill people who still have capacity to make that choice but once you make it law it opens the floodgates for people like ian brady to argue that you are then denying him his lawful right to kill himself.
Hardly mate. He can't argue that he isn't allowed to pop out to the pub or go for a walk in the park just because others have the right to do so. The same argument would apply in the case of euthanasia.
People like him have (almost) no rights.
it becomes a human rights issue once it becomes law.
then he would take it to the european courts of human rights mate..............not saying it's right but sadly it's true.And? Contrary to what people think, we are not bound by the ECHR. Brady would be told to sod off by any Home Secretary that valued their job.
And? Contrary to what people think, we are not bound by the ECHR. Brady would be told to sod off by any Home Secretary that valued their job.