The differences between GOT and RAWK are...

[dholliday]

- GOT is funny, RAWK isn't.

- GOT's posts are succinct and readably short, RAWK's posts are epic in length, if not in content.

- GOT's presentation is bright and easy on the eyes, RAWK looks dull and exhausting.

- GOT's members don't take themselves too seriously, RAWK's members however...

- GOT being cliquey is a silly in-joke, RAWK being cliquey is cultish.



Any more differences you've noticed?

 

[davek]

- GOT eats pizza
- RAWK eats Suarez's cock.

 

[Brennan]

RAWK is way funnier than this place. It's just not intentional.

 

[Eric Djemba-Djemba]

GOT is sound. RAWK is not.

 

[bluejock]

GOT has Carlos
RAWK has Andy@Allerton

 

[zirc]

GOT bans WUMs and allows criticism of the club
RAWK bans those who criticise the club and deletes critical posts and allows WUMs (as long as they toe the party line, even if sarcastically/satirically)

 

[roydo]

GOT is a haven in a horrible world.
RAWK explains why such world is so horrible.

 

[davek]

GOT has Carlos
RAWK has Andy@Allerton

Close thread

That just bundles it all up into its essence.

 

[dholliday]

That just bundles it all up into its essence.

Yeah...agreed. I didn't know this Allerton character, but some quick googling revealed some pretty nasty & paranoid stuff.

Carlos keeps us right, long may He reign!

 

[bluejock]

Him and that Harinder are everything that are wrong with Kopites.

 

[Tubey]

RAWK is way funnier than this place. It's just not intentional.

Haha was about to type that exact sentence when I saw the OP.

RAWK is farrrrrrrrrrrr funnier.

 

[steken1]

If Rawk was a boozer it'd be burnt down years ago

If GOT was a boozer it'd be the Lisbon!

 

[Ihaters]

We go on there to laugh at their paranoid delusions.
They come on here to check we're not laughing at them.

 

[helpimonfire]

We go on there to laugh at their paranoid delusions.
They come on here to check we're not laughing at them.

 

[carlos21]

thanks guys carlos.