The fact that it was just so effortless, and well, natural, shows just how much talent those guys had.
Didn't he record it just to prove to the Stones that he could do hard stuff too?
It sounds stilted and calculated to me - The Beatles did forty or fifty better songs - but that is part of the beauty of
The White Album...it is is different things to different people. It seems to be loaded with filler, or even dross, and yet its sequencing (this really is part of its genius, by the way. Yep, the order of the tracks....) makes it impossible to consider jettisoning a second of it.
How could the Fabs exist in such a surreal remove from our reality and yet reflect it so well all the time? There are dozens - maybe hundreds - of reasons why the Beatles are the most artistically important event(s) in pop music but surely one of the main ones is how they both lead and echoed the public vibe for seven dizzyingly hectic, world-altering, map-burning years. Somehow, by Epstein dying and Yoko becoming ever more "there" amongst them and them heading off to India with the Maharishi (get a grip lads you're Scousers, for f
uck's sake) and George becoming ever more confident and them generally going off one another they managed to come up with a record that reflected 1968 as well as
Sgt Pepper reflected 1967. Everything is slightly ****ed, it cried out. But it's still worth keeping an eye on, it added - just don't believe all that hippy sh
it that we were all into last week. Even the artwork was perfect (more so that
Pepper or
Rubber Soul or
With the Beatles, in my opinion).
I bought The White Album on white vinyl on Capitol Records in the USA in 1980. I was just turned sixteen and it bemused the f
uck out of me at the time but I never gave up on it. Something made me keep coming back to it and in the end it just somehow clicked. These days it is just
there, top ten of all time. Indefinable but brilliant. Even its flaws are perfect.