Technology or 2 refs?

SerenityNigh · February 2, 2016

For the money in the modern game, can't see why both aren't implemented.

Jags..class · February 3, 2016

The Cowboy said:
Personally I'd prefer an additional ref in a prime viewing spot in the stand, offering a better perspective on the game. I wouldn't want them to have video reviews, I just don't like the idea of any sort of halt of play for review. But I think an official with a broader view of the field could really help the ref. And I'd want that official to have pretty much the same powers as the ref. If they say it's a sending off, the ref needs a really good reason to disagree.

It's only takes a second to see if the goal is legal.

Whistlin' Dixie · February 3, 2016

gaino92 said:
Each team should have 1 challenge per game for incidents, goes to a video ref he says yay or nay then that's the end of it

What one 'decision' would you have challenged twattenburk over? :oops:

Brendan Janus · February 3, 2016

Whistlin' Dixie said:
What one 'decision' would you have challenged twattenburk over?

Probably that his one sock was higher than the other !!

Whistlin' Dixie · February 3, 2016

Brendan Janus said:
Probably that his one sock was higher than the other !!

That's his ma's fault for dressing him like that.

I'd have gone for that ridiculous hair transplant and the spikey style arsehair-barnet he's got now.

The Cowboy · February 3, 2016

Jags..class said:
It's only takes a second to see if the goal is legal.

In a clear cut case, perhaps. Even now there's still no consensus (due to the bewildering construct of the offside rule) on whether RFM was offside for his goal vs City, for example.