Stronger - In more ways than one

Status
Not open for further replies.

The transfer window slammed shut with Evertonians world-wide still baffled by the deadline day farce that seemed to unfold, every second streamed (albeit with a seeming 2 hour lag from reality) by the now nauseating SkySportsNews channel. It's just gone too far now in terms of transfer coverage, perhaps though that's a view down to the writer's ageing years rather than anything else.

Perhaps now is as good a time as any to take stock of where exactly Everton 'are at'.

Moshiri paid big 'bucks' for our Dutch manager, Ronald Koeman. Before and after the acquisition of Steve Walsh as a supplemental resource in the backroom staffing, Moshiri again got the cheque book out to purchase a new number 2 GK (now number 1 it seems), Euro semi-finalist and national captain Ashley Williams, enigmatic Yannick Bolasie and a not-so-cheap loan signing of Enner Valencia. Forgot anyone? Oh. Yes. The absolutely superb Idrissa Gueye/Gana/whatever. What a player.

Koeman has employed a new system whereby Everton, without the ball, have to run. Seems simple enough, no? The sight of Ross Barkley legging it around Goodison Park with conviction is a success in itself. After all, under the previous management he was quite clearly told to conserve energy.

Everton look 'snappy'. The intelligence in the pressing game is particularly impressive to see. Instead of the 'medium-block' tactic deployed by Martinez, Koeman has impressed onto his players the need for more aggression. Everton sit in and allow the opposition to play out from time to time, especially in periods of pressure. What is fantastic to see though is, to relieve that pressure and keep the opposition largely away from our penalty box, whenever an opponent receives the ball with his back to our
goal, wherever it is on the pitch, inevitably you will see an Everton player busting a gut to clatter him. Barry and Baines have been the standout performers in this regard. Both players, not blessed with pace, seemed exposed constantly last season having players turning and running at them. Tactically, Koeman has been a huge success (so far).

This tenacity defensively, together with - it has to be said - the attacking fluidity impressed on the players by Martinez (tinkered no doubt by Koeman, particularly by going more direct at times) has gained Everton 7 points out of 9 in the league. Best start in a decade. A success? Conceivably.

There is an undertone of discontent at the moment because, despite the impressive nature of our performances, despite the points return, despite being able to defend a cross/corner, the summer/early season has been underwhelming. Whilst the clamour for marquee signings is understandable - to a degree - some of the best performances and league finishes have been obtained in the last 15 years without one. On top of that, Everton already have a few players who would have been marquee signing for 90% of clubs in world football. Lukaku certainly. Keeping him and adding a sprinkling of power (Bolasie) any other year would be deemed a successful window. Due to the raised expectations this summer, the success of the window may be a little more difficult to accept as such.

Once a few more games pass - winnable certainly given the opposition - perhaps blues will be singing the blues with a little more vigour, with knowledge that actually this summer and the purchases made, as well as the upwards trajectory of the club, was/were/is a resounding success.

Enjoyed that. Good read

I certainly think the window was better than some are making out, though I wouldn't call it a "resounding success", I would certainly say it was "solid" and left us a better team at the end of it

Had we got a better back up striker, then I would be more inclined to rate it higher
 
Enjoyed that. Good read

I certainly think the window was better than some are making out, though I wouldn't call it a "resounding success", I would certainly say it was "solid" and left us a better team at the end of it

Had we got a better back up striker, then I would be more inclined to rate it higher

if you take the first XI as the following
-------------Stek-------------------
Coleman--Williams---Jags----Baines
-----------Gueye---Barry-----------
Mirallas------Barkley-----Bolasie
-----------Lukaku----------------

That leaves Holgate, Mori, Oviedo, McCarthy, Besic (when fit) Lennon, Del, Cleverley, Valencia as back up with some of them being very strong options from the bench. Not Man City standard by any stretch, but decent enough and lots of experience.

I think we are going to do OK if we steer clear of injuries.
 
if you take the first XI as the following
-------------Stek-------------------
Coleman--Williams---Jags----Baines
-----------Gueye---Barry-----------
Mirallas------Barkley-----Bolasie
-----------Lukaku----------------

That leaves Holgate, Mori, Oviedo, McCarthy, Besic (when fit) Lennon, Del, Cleverley, Valencia as back up with some of them being very strong options from the bench. Not Man City standard by any stretch, but decent enough and lots of experience.

I think we are going to do OK if we steer clear of injuries.
Our squad depth looks to be pretty good actually ....and still net spend + - 0
From economic stand point thats not bad at all.
 

Look up resounding in the dictionary mate. The definition is 'unmistakable; total.' See the second word there? It answers your question quite well I think. If we didn't meet all our objectives it can't be a total success can it?

It also quite neatly backs up my point about pretending. You know it wasn't a total success, and yet you want to call it resounding - so you're pretending that it was a total success. That's not my opinion, it's a fact.

Whilst I am loath to get into a debate on the english language and context, I think you're missing the point. I do however very much appreciate the debate and feedback.

What were our objectives going into the summer? to come out with a more balanced squad, bin off some of the deadwood, add some leaders, bring in some more resources (Steve Walsh), change the manager, improve the fitness of the squad.. the list goes on and on.

Using those as objectives, the summer and start of the season has been a resounding success (in my opinion). We have achieved all we set out to achieve. Could we have brought in a marquee signing? Perhaps. I don't believe though bringing in Moussa Sissoko would have meant we had something in the squad we don't already possess. Therefore, it wouldn't have meant we were more successful just because we threw £30million at a player who turned up to 5 games for his club last season.

Koeman himself has said that he needs 2 years to build his team. 1 summer in and I believe the club's activities have been a resounding (unmistakable in the context of it cannot be ignored - very distinctive) success.
 
Whilst I am loath to get into a debate on the english language and context, I think you're missing the point. I do however very much appreciate the debate and feedback.

What were our objectives going into the summer? to come out with a more balanced squad, bin off some of the deadwood, add some leaders, bring in some more resources (Steve Walsh), change the manager, improve the fitness of the squad.. the list goes on and on.

Using those as objectives, the summer and start of the season has been a resounding success (in my opinion). We have achieved all we set out to achieve. Could we have brought in a marquee signing? Perhaps. I don't believe though bringing in Moussa Sissoko would have meant we had something in the squad we don't already possess. Therefore, it wouldn't have meant we were more successful just because we threw £30million at a player who turned up to 5 games for his club last season.

Koeman himself has said that he needs 2 years to build his team. 1 summer in and I believe the club's activities have been a resounding (unmistakable in the context of it cannot be ignored - very distinctive) success.
Fair enough. Obviously I disagree.

It's nothing to do with marquee signings, simply that we have quite clearly not addressed all of the issues which the manager wanted to address. Some of which I think may come back to bite us as the season rumbles on. Hard fought wins over West Brom and Stoke are more than welcome, but I've seen enough issues in those games to think we may hit some rough patches this season.

It is well known that he wanted another keeper. I don't believe for a second that Koeman has suddenly seen something in a 33 year old keeper who he has worked with twice before which has changed his opinion on his abilities. I think he was brought in as back up, and for whatever reason we were unable to bring in the quality of number 1 he wanted, so he has decided to stick with what he had. The fact that in the space of a week Koeman went from refusing to comment on Hart to saying we weren't interested tells me there was more to that one than the party line would have us believe.

Likewise with the centre half situation. It seems pretty clear that we attempted to sign Koulibaly and Kone. These were as well as Williams, not instead of him. We now have a manager who likes to regularly play 3 at the back, and only 3 senior centre halves and one promising rookie to select the 3 from. That's not ideal, and the manager knows it.

The summer has undoubtedly had plus points. The change of manager is obviously a huge one, Gana looks a very good addition so far, and I have no doubt Williams will do an excellent job for us. I'm not a big fan of Bolasie but Koeman clearly rates him highly so that's the important thing. The point I was making initially though was that - despite what many people would have you believe - this is not just a few fans moaning because they wanted to gloat about our new signings. It is absolutely irrefutable that both the manager and the chairman are disappointed that we didn't do better in the transfer market this summer. If they are disappointed, we all should be.
 
if you take the first XI as the following
-------------Stek-------------------
Coleman--Williams---Jags----Baines
-----------Gueye---Barry-----------
Mirallas------Barkley-----Bolasie
-----------Lukaku----------------

That leaves Holgate, Mori, Oviedo, McCarthy, Besic (when fit) Lennon, Del, Cleverley, Valencia as back up with some of them being very strong options from the bench. Not Man City standard by any stretch, but decent enough and lots of experience.

I think we are going to do OK if we steer clear of injuries.

I think that highlights more our lack of quality in depth to be honest. Cleverley, Valencia, Oviedo, arguably Besic and McCarthy are really not good enough. We do need to steer clear of injuries, absolutely. Lennon will do a reliable job, Deulofeu is a good backup option who's knocking on the door of a first team place, and Holgate in my opinion will displace Jagielka before the end of the season. Apart from that we're struggling, an injury to someone like Baines, Lukaku or Barkley and we don't have anyone good enough to fill the void if we're being honest with ourselves.
 
The transfer window slammed shut with Evertonians world-wide still baffled by the deadline day farce that seemed to unfold, every second streamed (albeit with a seeming 2 hour lag from reality) by the now nauseating SkySportsNews channel. It's just gone too far now in terms of transfer coverage, perhaps though that's a view down to the writer's ageing years rather than anything else.

Perhaps now is as good a time as any to take stock of where exactly Everton 'are at'.

Moshiri paid big 'bucks' for our Dutch manager, Ronald Koeman. Before and after the acquisition of Steve Walsh as a supplemental resource in the backroom staffing, Moshiri again got the cheque book out to purchase a new number 2 GK (now number 1 it seems), Euro semi-finalist and national captain Ashley Williams, enigmatic Yannick Bolasie and a not-so-cheap loan signing of Enner Valencia. Forgot anyone? Oh. Yes. The absolutely superb Idrissa Gueye/Gana/whatever. What a player.

Koeman has employed a new system whereby Everton, without the ball, have to run. Seems simple enough, no? The sight of Ross Barkley legging it around Goodison Park with conviction is a success in itself. After all, under the previous management he was quite clearly told to conserve energy.

Everton look 'snappy'. The intelligence in the pressing game is particularly impressive to see. Instead of the 'medium-block' tactic deployed by Martinez, Koeman has impressed onto his players the need for more aggression. Everton sit in and allow the opposition to play out from time to time, especially in periods of pressure. What is fantastic to see though is, to relieve that pressure and keep the opposition largely away from our penalty box, whenever an opponent receives the ball with his back to our
goal, wherever it is on the pitch, inevitably you will see an Everton player busting a gut to clatter him. Barry and Baines have been the standout performers in this regard. Both players, not blessed with pace, seemed exposed constantly last season having players turning and running at them. Tactically, Koeman has been a huge success (so far).

This tenacity defensively, together with - it has to be said - the attacking fluidity impressed on the players by Martinez (tinkered no doubt by Koeman, particularly by going more direct at times) has gained Everton 7 points out of 9 in the league. Best start in a decade. A success? Conceivably.

There is an undertone of discontent at the moment because, despite the impressive nature of our performances, despite the points return, despite being able to defend a cross/corner, the summer/early season has been underwhelming. Whilst the clamour for marquee signings is understandable - to a degree - some of the best performances and league finishes have been obtained in the last 15 years without one. On top of that, Everton already have a few players who would have been marquee signing for 90% of clubs in world football. Lukaku certainly. Keeping him and adding a sprinkling of power (Bolasie) any other year would be deemed a successful window. Due to the raised expectations this summer, the success of the window may be a little more difficult to accept as such.

Once a few more games pass - winnable certainly given the opposition - perhaps blues will be singing the blues with a little more vigour, with knowledge that actually this summer and the purchases made, as well as the upwards trajectory of the club, was/were/is a resounding success.

We've played three league games for goodness sake.

Should we at least draw at home with Spurs? Yes.

Should we beat Stoke and West Brom? Yes if we're aiming to win more than 19 of our 38 games (top 6 ish)

Should we beat Yeovil at home easily in a cup game? Of course.

Judge it after 19 games. Would it be 'Koemoyes out' if we had just 1 point? or 3? Nope.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top