stones and barkley

[Peter The Dog]

both appear to be surplus to requirements.

would you take either/both of them back?

 

[Nymzee]

 

[NeilA1878]

both appear to be surplus to requirements.

would you take either/both of them back?

I'd be fine with Stones on loan if our first choices don't come off and we want to wait until someone else becomes available.

Not a chance with Barkley though. Burnt his bridges.

 

[COYBL25]

 

[ProZ]

Now where did I put that cheese grater.

 

[EFCccc]

I’d have Stones back. Swerve Barkley tho.

 

[john jako]

The lack of capital letters for names in the title is stressing me out.

 

[FTY]

No

One’s a defender who can’t defend on fatty wages, one’s that much of a bellend that I wouldn’t want back even if he’d been playing like KDB since he left

 

[ToffeeTim]

No

One is always injured and the other did us out of a good fee when he left.

 

[Pittsburgh Footy]

I don't care what Ross did to us when he left.

But more important to me is he is a terrible footballer

 

[DanB90]

Bad Dog!

 

[Cing C0br]

No

 

[Barnfred 55]

The lack of capital letters for names in the title is stressing me out.

i agree with you john jako. john stones and ross barkley have no place at everton and should stay at manchester city and chelsea.

 

[Peter The Dog]

Bad Dog!

*shuffles off with tail between legs*

 

[Khalekan]

both appear to be surplus to requirements.

would you take either/both of them back?

Nope.