• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

SKY SPORTS BIAS

Status
Not open for further replies.

R.Reddington

Player Valuation: £35m
Making a comparison between this week and last...
You have Man United vs Liverpool and Swansea vs Spurs. From 12.30 to 1.30 (KO) the 'pundits' were having an orgy about the 'biggest game in world [Poor language removed] football' and there was ZERO mention of the later game Swansea vs Spurs.
Today we have Newcastle vs Sunderland and Liverpool vs Arsenal. What a [Poor language removed] surprise the knobs talk about Liverpool vs Arsenal first instead of the BIGGER game which is a huge derby in England. Get a [Poor language removed] grip Sky you're slowly making BT Sports coverage look half good.
Instead of being [Poor language removed] bias towards 'the bigger clubs' make your coverage an hour longer and give the fans of the other clubs who pay good money for your [Poor language removed] coverage a little back.
 


To be fair, Man Utd v Liverpool is historically a huge match - just like Juventus v Inter and Real Madrid v Barcelona is.

But the OP makes a good point, don't know why he's getting stick? It's right, they will always talk about the 'big' teams far, far more than the 'smaller' clubs even though both sets of fixtures are being played back-to-back. It IS annoying and I support Man Utd. I am very interested in how the smaller clubs are doing, especially the likes of Swansea who continue to surprise me year after year.

But as someone else correctly stated above, clubs like Man Utd and Liverpool are going to have hundreds of thousands more supporters worldwide tuning in for the game than, let's say, Swansea or Sunderland.

Footy has always been like this - when I was a kid and Man Utd were rubbish it would be Arsenal and Liverpool dominating the channels. It will always be this way too.
 
A little something that annoyed me last week, we were the first tie to be drawn in the EL, yet a photo that sky put on Twitter had us bottom of the list of 4 British ties. Why? I know it doesn't matter, but someone went out of their way to rejig the order to stick the others before us.
 
I try not to let it bother me, but even I was a bit narked off during last week's Monday Night Football, when instead of talk about our upcoming game with QPR, the Sky studio spent 95% of the build up jizzing over David DeGea and the 'big' matches from the previous 2 days

That's how they do MNF every week, talk about the big or controversial topics from the weekend and then a little bit about the game before it starts.

No bias there.
 

Try reading the Telegraph Sports section if you really want to see EFC shafted and LFC bummed (with City, Utd & Chelski rogered)
 
Football supporters are so paranoid. They're all the same over at RAWK and they're the same at RedCafe too. "Everyone is against us" sort of thing.

It's not actually true though. Certain pundits have their favourite teams but I don't think there's "bias" - that's too strong a word. (Unless your name is Phil Thompson of course!)
 
Football supporters are so paranoid. They're all the same over at RAWK and they're the same at RedCafe too. "Everyone is against us" sort of thing.

It's not actually true though. Certain pundits have their favourite teams but I don't think there's "bias" - that's too strong a word. (Unless your name is Phil Thompson of course!)

So you don't agree that there is an unhealthy preponderance of ex LFC players and fans in the media then? :)
 
It's always Utd and Kopite fans who come out with the "no bias here" stuff also.

Agree completely with the OP I pay good money for sky I want some coverage of MY club not seeing the usual suspects on every second of every day to appease the Asian contingent watching across the seas
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top