Sky Liverpool season ticket

[toffeejack]

1,155,000 wba vs rs sun 2nd feb
1,133,000 spurs vs everton 9th feb.
959,000 swansea vs spurs 19th jan
1,541,000 newcastle vs man city 12th jan
966,000 southampton vs spurs 22nd dec

just some viewing figures for sunday 1.30 pm kick offs, cant be arsed to check any more.

hardly a great selection of games haha

 

[ToffeeDan]

A pub full of 300 (R..S....) counts as 1 -as Brian said 1 = 20 - 1 "go the game" and the other 19 watch in the pub.

 

[mrb85]

Regardless of TV money it's impossible for us to compete with them.

Liverpool are on the TV more than us because they're more popular and provide better viewing figures. Simple as that.

And one factor in their being more popular is that they are on TV more.......

 

[Ara]

Don't sky have to show each team x amount of times?

Liverpool are the biggest supported club in the world and unless we do a city we never will catch them

 

[Joey66]

Its being going on for seasons even when they were crass!

 

[ronnie38]

Don't sky have to show each team x amount of times?

Liverpool are the biggest supported club in the world and unless we do a city we never will catch them

They may well be but they've finished below Everton the last two seasons which shows they can be caught. If they do get top 4 though I feel they may well be uncatchable.

 

[SimonB]

All the RS'll be sat at home in full kits ready for the kick off right now.

 

[Cookachoo]

To be fair, the reason that more of their games are shown along with Chelsea's, City's etc is because as the season draws to a close, the focus shifts to the title race and the relegation battle. These games are infinitely more exciting to the neutral and the Premier Leagues global audience, as opposed to a game between Southampton and West Ham, neither of which have anything to fight for.

I don't think it Is anything to do with bias, the fact is they are an entertaining team to watch , and invariably score lots of goals. These are the types of games Sky want to be showing as opposed to the likes of Newcastle and Villa last Sunday, which was absolutely atrocious to watch, but they do have a minimal quota to fill for each club.

If we were involved in a title race or a relegation battle, we would be on the telly an awful lot more than we are. United are probably in more than us because they are the Champions and everyone is incredibly intrigued by their plummet down the table.

 

[Chang Elephant]

To be fair, the reason that more of their games are shown along with Chelsea's, City's etc is because as the season draws to a close, the focus shifts to the title race and the relegation battle. These games are infinitely more exciting to the neutral and the Premier Leagues global audience, as opposed to a game between Southampton and West Ham, neither of which have anything to fight for.

I don't think it Is anything to do with bias, the fact is they are an entertaining team to watch , and invariably score lots of goals. These are the types of games Sky want to be showing as opposed to the likes of Newcastle and Villa last Sunday, which was absolutely atrocious to watch, but they do have a minimal quota to fill for each club.

If we were involved in a title race or a relegation battle, we would be on the telly an awful lot more than we are. United are probably in more than us because they are the Champions and everyone is incredibly intrigued by their plummet down the table.

Fancy coming the Winslow April 19th Cooks ?