Should we have an outfield player take the Goal Kicks?

Should an outfield player take our goal kicks?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 3.8%
  • No

    Votes: 89 84.8%
  • Cheese on Toast (Other dairy and bread based products are available)

    Votes: 12 11.4%

  • Total voters
    105
Status
Not open for further replies.


So Joel Robles had an assist once and that means his distribution is good?

Oumar Niasse scored a goal once, does that make him a good striker?

You are the one making the point that his kicking is so bad that you are actually suggesting we have an outfield player take the kicks. Care to provide any evidence that might back up this point?

Seeing as you are now talking about distribution, rather than kicks, perhaps you should consider that means his throws and short passes in addition to his goal kicks.

It's okay to be wrong mate, trust me I have plenty of experience.
 

The proof is how the stoke attackers deliberately pushed up to stop him passing short, so he had to kick it long because they knew he'd give it back to them

your seeing things that aren't there Mikey. Stoke pushed up no more than they would on someone else. His kicking was fine ( goalkicks and when he had to clear his lines from a backpass ) and on the occassions the ball was coming back to us from his kicks it's because the front 3 were absolutely awful at getting in front of their man and challenging for the ball.
 
..I thought Robles distribution was quite good last night. I remember Gordon West going through a lengthy spell where he couldn't kick it, ironically he could throw it the half way line and became very accurate with it. I think John Hurst took the goal kicks but it meant the opposing forward could stand on the edge of the box. Tactically it carries risk.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top