Dubai Blue
Player Valuation: £8m
Came across an article from a while back:
-------------
In the soundbite from Uli Hoeness (former Bayern Munich President), from last year, he says: 'We could charge more than £104. Let's say we charged £300. We'd get £2m more in income but what's £2m to us?
'In a transfer discussion you argue about that sum for five minutes. But the difference between £104 and £300 is huge for the fan.
'We do not think the fans are like cows, who you milk. Football has got to be for everybody.
'That's the biggest difference between us and England.'
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tting-Premier-League-shame.html#ixzz3hwiKIxeu
Is 2m added revenue really something that is a significant factor to the English game? If so wouldn't it be better to have to drawn through another revenue stream (take your pick!).
Or is it just "the price of things" and if the football fan is used to paying, why change it?
-------------
'In a transfer discussion you argue about that sum for five minutes. But the difference between £104 and £300 is huge for the fan.
'We do not think the fans are like cows, who you milk. Football has got to be for everybody.
'That's the biggest difference between us and England.'
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tting-Premier-League-shame.html#ixzz3hwiKIxeu
-------------
Do we think that this is a fair comparison to the English league? Are ticket prices higher here because of the standard or football, or other taxes, charges that the club has to account for? I find it hard for their to be such a huge gap between 2 fairly similar leagues.
Is 2m added revenue really something that is a significant factor to the English game? If so wouldn't it be better to have to drawn through another revenue stream (take your pick!).
Or is it just "the price of things" and if the football fan is used to paying, why change it?