Should so much negative reputation trigger a suspension? (Prevent that user posting until at least a moderator re-approves?)
-
Turn On Christmas Radio
Bah humbug - to turn off the snow, visit your preferences and select a style that isn't Christmas.
Reputation System...
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
- Status
No, I don't like the idea that you can be banned for being unpopular.
D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
Me either, maybe de-rep them, like NIK. So they understand the merit of good standing.
New member.
5/6 established members negative rep something they post. It would imply that new member is a clear WUM, or posting something outrageously poor in taste.
That members posts then placed in a moderating queue?
Makes some sense to me...
5/6 established members negative rep something they post. It would imply that new member is a clear WUM, or posting something outrageously poor in taste.
That members posts then placed in a moderating queue?
Makes some sense to me...
D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
Can this be done for NIK? Like a sin bin?
Plus if this is known, it's likely to be abused..
You're just giving power to the clique then, though. Just because I, as an established member, dislike a post doesn't mean it's a bad post, I could have misread it or just be in a bad mood.
You were talking earlier about how a lot of new members just lurk and don't post, is giving power to the existing posters to, temporarily, by concensus, ban people going to make people more or less likely to post? It'll just give the place an intimidating and none welcoming reputation.
You were talking earlier about how a lot of new members just lurk and don't post, is giving power to the existing posters to, temporarily, by concensus, ban people going to make people more or less likely to post? It'll just give the place an intimidating and none welcoming reputation.
I learned yesterday that everyone will back me up, no matter what I say, just to avoid looking like a phobe.
That means I'm not just in the clique, I basically am the clique.
CLIQUE, CLIQUE, CLIQUE. Paranoia.
Anyway. It would all carrying the same weighting, thus making that point relatively void.
Someone who'd been here for a year, but hadn't posted, would have the same weighting as someone with 10k posts.
Any negative reputation is already treated as a 'Report'
If, let's say, FIVE different members found one post to be worthy of negative reputation/report to a moderator, that would heavily imply that a lot of other members (those who you say, lurk) would find that new member to be an irritant. By then placing their new posts into a temporary moderating queue for a moderator to approve, it would instil a more self regulating forum.
bluejock
Boss coat aficionado
*dons mesh vest to try and fit in
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
